Hi,

Not sure if this is the same issue but I believe you might need the
tcp_tw_reuse  and tcp_tw_recycle parameters in /proc/sys/net/ipv4 to be at
a value of 1?  Since you already achieved 10000 connections, I'm thinking
it's probably something else though.

Cheers,
Charles

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Amit Bhagra <amit.bha...@agnity.com>wrote:

> Hello All
>
>                         Tomcat Server:             7.0.35
>
> Operating System Version:  Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5
> (Tikanga)
>
> Java Version:              java version "1.6.0_11"
>
> Memory:                    4137112 kB
>
> CPU:                       Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5530  @ 2.40GHz
> (Quad core with HT enabled)
>
>
>
>                         I am developing a tomcat application which requires
> a large number of websocket connections to remain opened during the time
> users are logged in (around 40-50 thousand). I have a ruby script (written
> using faye-websocket) which can open as many websocket connections as we
> desire and then send random messages on websockets and receive response
> from
> server. This works well for small number of concurrent websocket
> connections. The issue is I am not able to achieve a very high number of
> websocket connections. Using the default blocking connector of Tomcat only
> that much connections can be opened as specified with maxThreads param
> (500-600). Configuring a NIO connector I am able to open around 10000
> connections after that the connections start to close automatically. I have
> set the fd-limit to 65535 accordingly and using a 1GB initial heap size.
> Even with an APR connector the number remains pretty much same.
>
>
>
>                         My question is what configurations or steps I can
> take in order to achieve desired number of concurrent websocket connections
> (40000-50000). Has anybody been able to achieve this much number of
> simultaneous websocket connections with a tomcat app? Thanks in advance for
> answering this.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Amit Bhagra
>
>

Reply via email to