On Jun 2, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Web Servers are web servers primarily, focused on
HTTP, compliance, speed and capability. Use the
right tool for the right job :)
Agreed.
If you only need a web server, use a web server.
I think that the question is not whether to replace
the web server, but whether the web server is needed
for delivering the static content in cases where
there is already a Tomcat. In that case the APR can
be used.
Agreed. Although for simple static content, using
web server caching can result in even better
performance as well... Most "just a web server"
web servers have robust caching built in (as
well as flexible proxying as well).
The subject line does say "Why not?" right? :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
