On 08.11.2016 09:47, Christoph P.U. Kukulies wrote:
Am 07.11.2016 um 19:09 schrieb Caldarale, Charles R:
From: Christoph P.U. Kukulies [mailto:k...@kukulies.org]
Subject: Re: war file incompletely deployed
This makes sense somehow, but wouldn't a local move or copy from within
the server's filesystem have the same complications?
No, a local mv or rename in a modern file system simply changes the directory
structure;
no copy is performed. A copy does stand a chance of being caught in the
middle, but the
timing window is much, much smaller. Best to use mv/rename whenever possible.
- Chuck
So 'touch' a .LCK file in a place outside webapps, copy over the file, when
copy done
remove the .LCK file.
On the server a background process is running watching for the .LCK file.
when it's
gone, it does the 'mv'.
(a mv can imply a copy though when it goes across filesystems on different
drives).
Would it not be simpler to just rename the .war file, to .war.lck, then copy it to the
destination, then rename it (in place) to .war when the copy is finished ?
Tomcat should not even consider .war.lck files, right ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
