Thanks,

Will explore JSSE options.

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Jammy Chen <jamm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If you are using JSSE which you mentioned in earlier post, you probably can
> only enable debug for all or specially one
> -Djavax.net.debug=ssl:record or -Djavax.net.debug=ssl:handshake - but it
> will log all sessions
>
> You could try to register a customized SSL socket factory in JSSE, you may
> extend the default sun impl to overwrite the method, catch the exception
> and log the failure, and throw it.
>
> 2017-03-09 20:04 GMT+08:00 Durga Srinivasu Karuturi <
> durgasriniv...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Our application meaning on RHEL machine within JVM with embedded tomcat
> > (with single web-app)
> >
> > Okay, tomcat may not have this information on handshake failures.
> >
> > I need to see little higher level for capturing these failures.
> >
> > Thanks for answers so far.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Durga Srinivasu
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:44 PM, André Warnier (tomcat) <a...@ice-sa.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 09.03.2017 09:34, Durga Srinivasu Karuturi wrote:
> > >
> > >> This is one of the requirement from FIPS/CC certification.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Durga Srinivasu
> > >>
> > >>
> > > Durga,
> > >
> > > I believe that in your original post, you said :
> > > "We have a requirement in our application to log all TLS session
> > failures."
> > >
> > > You should probably have another look a the precise requirements, and
> the
> > > exact definition of "our application".
> > > Because it may be that the requirements are wrong, as far as you are
> > > concerned.
> > >
> > > It depends on what is included in "our application".
> > > In the java servlet container (like Tomcat) terminology, an
> "application"
> > > is a webapp.
> > > A webapp runs inside a servlet container.
> > > The servlet container (here Tomcat) runs inside a java JVM.
> > > The java JVM runs inside an OS.
> > > The OS runs inside a host.
> > >
> > > In that hierarchy, a webapp only sees a request, when the servlet
> > > container has received this request on one of its ports, and
> "delegates"
> > > the request to the webapp.
> > > By that time, the webapp does not even know through which interface the
> > > request came in, nor if that interface required HTTP, HTTPS or whatever
> > > other communications protocol.
> > > And if a TLS connection from a browser failed, the webapp is not even
> > > called, so it does not know anything about it.
> > > Of course the webapp cannot log a failure, if it is never called when
> > that
> > > failure happens.
> > >
> > > To move one level up : if a TLS connection from a browser fails, Tomcat
> > > probably never even sees that (because the connection never reaches
> > > Tomcat). So Tomcat cannot log this failure either. Tomcat is just
> telling
> > > some underlying layer of software (in the JVM, in the OS, or in some
> > > external library), what kind of connections to accept. But it does  not
> > > manage these connections, it just "gets" a connection when it succeeds.
> > >
> > > So if you (your team, your company) is responsible for providing the
> > whole
> > > service, including the host, the OS, the JVM, the servlet container,
> and
> > > the webapp inside it, then the requirement may make sense. And then you
> > > have to look for the component, at the right level, which can provide
> > that
> > > information. (But it is not the webapp, and it is not Tomcat).
> > >
> > > At the other extreme, if you are providing only the web application,
> then
> > > the requirement does not make sense /for you/, because it is
> impossible.
> > > It is not that it does not make sense in general, but "as part of the
> > > webapp" it does not make sense.
> > >
> > > And that is what Christopher is also telling you (in a lot less words).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Christopher Schultz <
> > >> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > >>> Hash: SHA256
> > >>>
> > >>> Durga,
> > >>>
> > >>> On 3/8/17 10:02 AM, Durga Srinivasu Karuturi wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> We are using JSSE only not APR. Looking for handshake failures.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Yes, using JSSE SSL debug, we are able to get all handshake
> > >>>> (-Djavax.net.debug=ssl:handshake) logs including success cases.
> > >>>> These are still quite bit expense logs and meant for debug
> > >>>> purposes. As you said it might impact performance that's the
> > >>>> reason, trying for any other optimal solution here.
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> I know of no way to be notified about handshake failures on the
> server
> > >>> side. You may not be able to fulfill this requirement if using Java
> > >>> for your crypto.
> > >>>
> > >>> Honestly, I'm not sure why you care about failed TLS handshakes. Are
> > >>> you trying to implement a NIDS in your application? This is
> > >>> better-handled by a network component specifically-designed for this
> > >>> kind of thing.
> > >>>
> > >>> - -chris
> > >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >>> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> > >>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> > >>>
> > >>> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYwEBVAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYHzkP/1O2jPMu6Z9MBdnCF6LD7FQl
> > >>> LMWA6jmO2YjmZFPtJykyUXHuL3beBk/+5cPV275ZApp1brJmmqnxR68P4ZuedOwY
> > >>> pX+dLiBTvmLYmsFoYxxfdvpl44UICwvq6qx/4VsSS0okrz9JYQtmO9d2glYG6bDD
> > >>> onLmqYoivB2N+18jXoT7PAzBZcAhHFbIFPIox4VXjs9za/WQ4Oc+BUecUKpOCc0i
> > >>> yvMz1I9Bo5E+tCMkTsTpbtq/Sk5lF7JozOycda3OVmLpVTf7Xz07luOF0ZaJAY0t
> > >>> VMHvNEOuph9dJxkS6mXlPnqqQwf3Prlwhx/zjWm6HT9prGBMraVb9laq44qMMUcg
> > >>> rDSSgfxZDiSJKDw7bCA3+o3KQfqIqbkLH9nQ2WICS2YAd9jn5tqy5Faf/H7Dd71D
> > >>> mYOdVxXPk5XJPuVOWaK9dVQOEppZ8JWjxxKaofFxFXmQpaiVbSP5FLduRrkvKgJc
> > >>> e9necMTzyxs9RwvpJjQtf10blDc51bL3Y+KjbTgJoPTqAIm8kUgI9VOE5NUs5eip
> > >>> 1MO9ub52ojavC10B+lU3OGggwHp068ozkM491stTZialCaTCmbo7LPZtKzIz0g4j
> > >>> q3JgDS4Y4LVPOoLPjUSfcbzTsxnS2V/SkLhOwQpnvw4lTLrotq5CGPJDQD5ix67j
> > >>> 2WbMcngOqAvk16kPb5u+
> > >>> =F7yo
> > >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >>>
> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to