Zahid, you‘re talking to one of the most respected members of the community like this?
STFU or leave. This calls for an ban! Peter > Am 08.01.2020 um 06:06 schrieb Zahid Rahman <zahidr1...@gmail.com>: > > >> >> A version of what? > MAVEN > MAVEN > MAVEN > > In light of this video https://youtu.be/idViw4anA6E > Of http. > > You and your let's encrypt must be the longest troll on this line. > > Take your wares and peddle them somewhere else carpet beggar. > > > > >> On Wed, 8 Jan 2020, 01:12 Christopher Schultz, <ch...@christopherschultz.net> >> wrote: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Zahid, >> >>> On 1/6/20 3:13 PM, Zahid Rahman wrote: >>> That must be the reason why Apache Netbeans is using a version from >>> 2015 >> >> A version of what? >> >>> and Apache Struts is recommending to use jdk 8. >> Apache Struts 2.5.x supports Java 7 and later. I see no official >> documentation recommending a specific Java version over any others. >> >>> Because there is somebody like you keeps telling people it is off >>> topic and Giant IT companies are not releasing jdk further than JDK >>> 8. >> >> Maybe just not for free. >> >> https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk13-downloads >> - -5672538.html >> https://www.azul.com/category/java13/ >> >> Admittedly, Oracle's JDK/JRE is based upon >> https://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/13/ so maybe that doesn't count >> as a separate release. >> >> But no, IBM doesn't appear to have a new version beyond Java 11. >> >>> The issue is a miserable and disgraceful failure in coordination by >>> Apache Foundation. >> >> So you found a problem with a package provided by Ubuntu/Debian, and >> your solution was to install the official Maven package from the >> Apache Software Foundation. And your conclusion is that the ASF is the >> miserable and disgraceful party, here? >> >> I'm so confused. >> >> It's worth pointing-out that there is no enforced coordination between >> ASF projects. Some of them work together in almost lock-step, like APR >> and httpd. Others are completely de-coupled. Some ignore each other >> (e.g. Apache Maven and Apache Tomcat). It's up to the individual >> projects to determine if/how they will work together. >> >> You may wish to read a little more about the ASF before you make >> blanket statements about it. >> https://community.apache.org/projectIndependence.html >> >> If you are dissatisfied with the ASF communities (or maybe just a few >> in particular), may I suggest that you take one of these two courses >> of action: >> >> 1. Volunteer to improve the situation. Usually in the form of >> patches/PRs to that project. >> >> 2. Take your complaints elsewhere. >> >> - -chris >> >>>> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, 19:45 Mark Thomas, <ma...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 06/01/2020 18:37, Zahid Rahman wrote: >>>>> To all ubuntu Maven users. >>>> >>>> This is off-topic for this mailing list. >>>> >>>> Please keep posts on this list on topic. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Mark >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Do NOT install maven using sudo apt install maven >>>>> >>>>> Install by direct download only from >>>>> https://maven.apache.org/download.cgi >>>>> >>>>> BECAUSE: >>>>> >>>>> "I seem to remember they [ubuntu] have their own build of Maven >>>>> which differs from the Apache source. >>>>> >>>>> ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maven/+bug/1754602 >>>>> suggests it's a known bug in their packaging/build? ) >>>>> >>>>> If you download Maven from http://maven.apache.org/download.cgi >>>>> and >>>> follow >>>>> the instructions in http://maven.apache.org/install.html then >>>>> you >>>> shouldn't >>>>> see those warnings. " ‐------------------- >>>>> >>>>> The Java 11 warning mentions that >>>>> "/usr/share/maven/lib/guice.jar" has a class named >>>>> "com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$1" >>>>> >>>>> This looks suspect because the official Maven distribution uses >>>>> the "no-AOP" version of Guice which doesn't contain any CGLIB >>>>> classes. It suggests that whoever provided that copy of Maven >>>>> has replaced the >>>> "no-AOP" >>>>> version with the "AOP" version, and this will cause warnings on >>>>> Java 11. (The "AOP" version uses CGLIB which currently relies >>>>> on certain >>>> reflective >>>>> access that Java 11 warns about - whereas the "no-AOP" version >>>>> doesn't.) >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ >> >> iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAl4VLGgACgkQHPApP6U8 >> pFjmuw//cXWmOfcRCt/2FqHwWZwuB23fIXrzEdOJ3RPdJEfwDUxtVcz/rXGI9TB6 >> ae64Vr1+8Znh8xX+wGvoScITo3L/qUPWDkWf5W3rAhhQNWCqsvJvCM4Sw7YE4ytE >> pv9gT9seDOx+wiGq+FQ5gdy1T7adgTwgYAVLCeuG/bvk4niz9vtYxXBXdfeTIb5e >> fjYY7sRzyhC9TQy8wq35JGXtlabxgXOPYqtlSRaZGX4m3wiLjOCyN5O+zXtmYfFk >> pnQ9exU5fez4RHgMt2ys9WFXYH8ZHVqIEkCwaFMrufOKGI+P6PVhtuj3c1mnHa0H >> RjSXHnd+hnUhwO3TWN7ClDH50KOHJCoT6kfXPh/RYxBC6yoY71DsFtP+l27xkVaV >> xh5nGkMcbBBLEpifhGBFd2tmjpRCMZqDU2433ROJJx7bqpNrLuAzRYcb8DISclSE >> ylqWL+s46ws251dp9RNBXJ1IYCI4fSxw/jiQUtjk7JCM1d8K6EyXK3NYC8IMLl9P >> Vw9OJdOhPvWHYISeym19GKKzFSWE/Qa/N8/jbzMf46jJMvJbrPwTAn3+IkTbSUoB >> aK7gfzjkReAUDmE//28CvTVdeF0tfHwM5lTnsJVWqFq+YsWH1hT9H5l4twkBvvsD >> WoyAfdtd/6F0WOWrjbkvB+WfT1QQ2rDgOUrYCJxAk4dSGsm95Ro= >> =ltKd >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
