Hello and thank you,

The error message reads as follows:
'org.apache.catalina.LifecycleException: Failed to start component
[StandardEngine[Catalina].StandardHost[localhost].StandardContext[/APPWARFILE]]'
There are two app files trying to start, and both are getting the same
error. The weird part is, these app packages were not touched since before
the summer. Server patches have happened since, but this is the first month
where Tomcat is doing this So, two key notes:
1: app packages have not been changed.
2: hot and warm servers have been patched, but only hot servers received
this Tomcat error. This is the first month I've seen Tomcat not start
properly, which makes me believe it's Tomcat.
Also, just FYI, this is for Tomcat 8.

Very respectfully,
Darious


On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 3:28 PM Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH)
<thomas.hoffm...@speed4trade.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Strib <darious.stribl...@gmail.com>
> > Gesendet: Montag, 24. Oktober 2022 08:10
> > An: users@tomcat.apache.org
> > Betreff: Apache Tomcat started, but error 404
> >
> > Hello, trying to see if anyone else had this issue. After a reboot of
> hot and
> > warm servers, my sites using Tomcat throws the error 404 only on the hot
> > servers. I've stopped and started Tomcat services, nothing. In the logs,
> there
> > were 2 errors. One was Catalina. But even though the error happened on
> hot
> > and warm servers, warm sites are still working, so I'm thinking that's
> not it. The
> > other error on the hot servers says startup error. Is it just luck of
> the draw, of
> > starting/stopping Tomcat services?
> > Is it something else, entirely? Frustrating that Tomcat does not have a
> UI to
> > make this easier. Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Very respectfully,
> > Darious
>
> Could you past the error message about startup issue?
> 404 sounds like your application failed to start but Tomcat is running.
> So it might be an issue with the application.
> In the log files there are usually information about the reason.
>
> Greetings, Thomas
>

Reply via email to