Stupid question,

Why don't you implement the 'virtual' hosts inside the one 'webapp'?
And not create 10,000 web apps?

That the App itself deals with the virtual hosts (by reading the host header), and not tomcat?

Andrew

On 26/08/2006, at 12:30 PM, KEGan wrote:

I tried to use only Tomcat since the static content is dynamically
generated. Think blogging application.

However, users dont update the data that often, that's why I generate the content and make it static for web access, as oppose to dynamically generate
the content each time it is requested. Using minimal CPU cycles.

Also, I tried to use ONLY Tomcat and do away with integration of Apache HTTP + Tomcat, or Lighthttpd + Tomcat, because its would be easier to maintain.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to