-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Pengtuck,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So let me get this straight. You are reluctant to accept a > configuration which gives you improved throughput ? :P No, the OP is unwilling to use a configuration that doesn't make any sense: one single Tomcat should outperform two Tomcats on the same physical server (unless you are talking about a 32-bit JVM that needs a lot of memory). > Anyway, this is not an unusual approach, from what I understand this > simply makes full use of the resources available on that machine. Not > uncommon in real world to see app servers like websphere being > configured in that manner. I would rarely recommend that a client run parallel app servers on the same machine for the same application for any purposes other than being able to switch between versions of the same application (say, for zero-downtime upgrade strategy). Since the OP didn't say that's what his requirements were, there doesn't seem to be a compelling reason to use this strategy. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkZ9fwACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCmmgCgsIDI3iuM/UZxuIeeeYxG20Sa f9YAoLBuum66IMTuSly3Q8kXQN8LaYz1 =7sA/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
