But not all. My hosting company, for what I regard as reasonable
monthly prices (10/20/30),
provides VMs running CentOS 5 with memory spaces of 160MB, 288MB, or
432 MB,
and have generally been pretty knowledgeable when I ask support
questions:
per Andre & Johnathan Swift, they only make "modest proposals".
--Ken
On Dec 2, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
Mark Thomas wrote:
hdisgr8 wrote:
Hi.
I would like our hosting company to host a server which needs
Tomcat.
Apparently Tomcat is not supported as the hosting company found it
to be an
'excessive drain on resource'. What might they mean by this?
One or more of:
- they are clueless and you need to find a better hosting company
- their previous customers were clueless and wrote inefficient web
applications
- their previous customers were clueless and used up significant
amount of
support time with Tomcat configuration questions
- they don't want the overhead of supporting another technology
- ...
I would add that many hosting companies these days are selling VM-
based
services with small memory spaces. You just can't run a decent J2EE
app
on 64MB of (total) memory, while running a PHP-based app in that same
space just might work.
- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkk1WVsACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCXMACgrxswJ0yf4FrV35PT9ND3YNaq
kY4AoJk9SuwSt6eMCbblcm92T5KA9Ma8
=BZZ5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
