Hi Ronald, Yes I was aware of that behaviour... Just for reference Firefox and Google Chrome also share session logic so I am surprised this hasn't been a problem for a lot more people. I am happy that my work around solves the session sharing problem but would still prefer to go down the dynamic context approach if this is at all possible? I am a bit tied up with some other development at the moment but will check the tomcat source code (unless someone can advise and save me the effort) when I get a chance.
Thanks very much for your assistance Ronald. Kind Regards, Rob > > Rob, > > IE 6 is even more confusing. If you open a new window with ctrl-N you have the > same session sharing as with tabs. Only if you click the IE6-icon to start a > new instance of the process it will not share them. Opening a new tab in IE7 > is like using ctrl-n to open a new window in IE6. > > Ronald. > > > Op dinsdag, 5 oktober 2010 10:26 schreef Rob Gregory > <rob.greg...@ibsolutions.com>: > > > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > Is there any way to dynamically create these contexts or do they require a > live.xml, test.xml, etc within conf/Catalina/localhost. The multiple contexts > would be my preferred approach although I would like to achieve this with a > single code base if this is possible. The multiple environments are driven > purely by the backend database connection, i.e. the code is the same with the > only difference being where the data is being saved to. Hence the requirement > to stop the browser sharing the same session when in different database > connections. > > > > I'm surprised that other people are not having the same issues since the > browser manufacturers decided to make this crazy change to session management > between tabs/instances and suddenly share the same session. In I.E.6 two > browser instances would be two separate sessions. I.E.7 they are the same > session! > > > > Thanks for your input. > > Kind Regards, > > Rob. > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Ronald, > > > > On 10/4/2010 6:11 AM, Ronald Klop wrote: > > > You can run your test environment on another hostname. > > > > > > live.example.com > > > test.example.com > > > train.example.com > > > > Or under another context: > > > > http://www.example.com/live > > http://www.example.com/test > > http://www.example.com/train > > > > The real question is why there's any confusion: your hostnames and/or > > URLs ought to be unique enough already. Otherwise, this sort of > > foolishness can affect your "real" users and you'll leak data all over > > the place. > > > > - -chris > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > > > iEYEARECAAYFAkyqDDQACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDWRACgrlgU+jY+n8nMCZ2WTO63UHDh > > 10UAoJdyNWqu0nlRGcWbJ6Mcc7zbsGy+ > > =JP4k > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
