Thank you Rainer, Now Apache is working with disable mode. Maybe later it changed again.
:) 2011/6/12 Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> > On 12.06.2011 09:30, Manuel Fernández Panzuela wrote: > > Is possible to combine both attributes distance - activation ? > > Distance looks like a very interesting attribute. > > Yes, of course you can combine. As long as you don't cnfuse yourself > because it gets too complicated. > > Distace (e.g. 0 and 1) will lead to normally everything being sent to > the "close" node, but when you switch its activation from active to > disabled, new sessions will be created on the node with higher distance. > Switching to "stopped" will result in every request being handled by the > node with higher distance. > > Regards, > > Rainer > > > 2011/6/11 Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> > > > >> On 08.06.2011 12:12, Felix Schumacher wrote: > >>> Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 09:47 +0200 schrieb Manuel Fernández > >>> Panzuela: > >>>> Yes Felix, you are right i am working with 2 instances. > >>>> I want primary node receives all requests and on failure send requests > >> to > >>>> the secondary node. > >>>> Is it possible with your recomendation ? > >>> You may also want to read > >>> > http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/loadbalancers.html > >>> if http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html was > >>> not helpful. > >>> > >>>> > >>>> worker.43m2g1.activation=d > >>>> degraded ??? is a condition ? then all requests will be redirected to > >> 43m2g1 > >>> disabled > >> > >> The attribute "distance" provides an alternative approach. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Rainer > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
