Jean-Louis, I appreciate the advice. I think the documentation might be considered a little bare when it comes to problems in this regard.
As TomEE becomes more popular (and it will), there will be people who simply won't know where TomEE ends and a sub-project begins. The greater the understanding gained from the main documentation page, the less time will be wasted by all. James On 3 March 2013 14:19, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> wrote: > James, > > Maybe the best is to push a mail here and we can determine if it's TomEE > fault or not. > Otherwise, you have to go through all apache project mailing lists and > either post, or check if that is a referenced bug or not. > > JLouis > > > 2013/3/3 James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com> > > > This I must be getting confused. > > > > On the home page for the project TomEE is composed as a distribution of > > tomcat plus other apache projects such as CXF. > > > > When I see a bug such as this, I read the above and naturally assume that > > the fault lay with CXF. After all, that's where responsibility for web > > services lay. > > > > So how come the bug is listed as TomEE's fault? > > > > Thanks, > > > > James > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On 2 Mar 2013, at 20:01, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Guess you spoke about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-690 > > > > > > Please take care to not merge any jaxrs fix done since this one (or > 1.5.2 > > > will not be a fixes release) > > > Le 2 mars 2013 20:12, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a > écrit > > : > > > > > >> Romain, if you can post the JIRA number that'd be great. > > >> > > >> > > >> -David > > >> > > >> On Mar 2, 2013, at 1:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hmm, providers were working in last release. The deployment is > > different > > >>> between both release (so the conf too a bit) but it will not be > merged > > >>> because too different. > > >>> Le 2 mars 2013 10:16, "James Green" <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com> a > > écrit : > > >>> > > >>>> David, > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks for this. Could someone kindly establish which Jira relates > to > > >>>> JAX-RS providers not being picked up, this is in 1.6 but am not sure > > if > > >> it > > >>>> is a bug fix candidate for 1.5 or a new feature for 1.6. Given it is > > in > > >> the > > >>>> official spec I might hope for the former... > > >>>> > > >>>> James > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Sent from my iPad > > >>>> > > >>>> On 2 Mar 2013, at 05:27, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Based on the feedback we got we've created a 1.5.2 branch based on > > the > > >>>> code from approximately Sat Jan 19. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This includes the following JIRAs that were requested: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-669 > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-668 > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-699 > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-703 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This does not yet include this requested JIRA: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-779 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> We will definitely add that. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> For those that are planing to use the 1.5.2 rather than the 1.6.0 > > with > > >>>> the various system rewrites for performance, can you please try the > > >> 1.5.2 > > >>>> snapshots and report if anything you need ismissing. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Builds available here: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> - http://tomee.apache.org/builds.html > > >>>>> > > >>>>> If possible, get your feedback in by Friday and we can start > rolling > > >>>> potential release candidates. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -David > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > Jean-Louis >
