Am being asked for my Apache ID. I'm listed on http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas but I doubt my full name is what is being asked for...
James On 3 March 2013 15:03, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fully agree. > The documentation must be updated. > > Do you have any idea? > Or would you propose changes? > > It's really easy, just use the blue pen icon on top-right of any page. You > can choose to edit anonymously and propose a modification. > Then, we just have to accept the update so that it's a huge contribution to > the project. > > Thanks, > Jean-Louis > > > 2013/3/3 James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com> > > > Jean-Louis, > > > > I appreciate the advice. I think the documentation might be considered a > > little bare when it comes to problems in this regard. > > > > As TomEE becomes more popular (and it will), there will be people who > > simply won't know where TomEE ends and a sub-project begins. The greater > > the understanding gained from the main documentation page, the less time > > will be wasted by all. > > > > James > > > > > > > > On 3 March 2013 14:19, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > James, > > > > > > Maybe the best is to push a mail here and we can determine if it's > TomEE > > > fault or not. > > > Otherwise, you have to go through all apache project mailing lists and > > > either post, or check if that is a referenced bug or not. > > > > > > JLouis > > > > > > > > > 2013/3/3 James Green <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > This I must be getting confused. > > > > > > > > On the home page for the project TomEE is composed as a distribution > of > > > > tomcat plus other apache projects such as CXF. > > > > > > > > When I see a bug such as this, I read the above and naturally assume > > that > > > > the fault lay with CXF. After all, that's where responsibility for > web > > > > services lay. > > > > > > > > So how come the bug is listed as TomEE's fault? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > > > > > On 2 Mar 2013, at 20:01, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Guess you spoke about > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-690 > > > > > > > > > > Please take care to not merge any jaxrs fix done since this one (or > > > 1.5.2 > > > > > will not be a fixes release) > > > > > Le 2 mars 2013 20:12, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a > > > écrit > > > > : > > > > > > > > > >> Romain, if you can post the JIRA number that'd be great. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> -David > > > > >> > > > > >> On Mar 2, 2013, at 1:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> Hmm, providers were working in last release. The deployment is > > > > different > > > > >>> between both release (so the conf too a bit) but it will not be > > > merged > > > > >>> because too different. > > > > >>> Le 2 mars 2013 10:16, "James Green" <james.mk.gr...@gmail.com> a > > > > écrit : > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> David, > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Thanks for this. Could someone kindly establish which Jira > relates > > > to > > > > >>>> JAX-RS providers not being picked up, this is in 1.6 but am not > > sure > > > > if > > > > >> it > > > > >>>> is a bug fix candidate for 1.5 or a new feature for 1.6. Given > it > > is > > > > in > > > > >> the > > > > >>>> official spec I might hope for the former... > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> James > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Sent from my iPad > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On 2 Mar 2013, at 05:27, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> Based on the feedback we got we've created a 1.5.2 branch based > > on > > > > the > > > > >>>> code from approximately Sat Jan 19. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> This includes the following JIRAs that were requested: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-669 > > > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-668 > > > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-699 > > > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-703 > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> This does not yet include this requested JIRA: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-779 > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> We will definitely add that. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> For those that are planing to use the 1.5.2 rather than the > 1.6.0 > > > > with > > > > >>>> the various system rewrites for performance, can you please try > > the > > > > >> 1.5.2 > > > > >>>> snapshots and report if anything you need ismissing. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Builds available here: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> - http://tomee.apache.org/builds.html > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> If possible, get your feedback in by Friday and we can start > > > rolling > > > > >>>> potential release candidates. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> -David > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jean-Louis > > > > > > > > > -- > Jean-Louis >
