hmmm okay/interesting. I'll have to see if this is a logging issue with Atmosphere Framework. Let me try some previous versions of Atmosphere that I downloaded earlier.
I definitely want to use TomEE 1.6.0 snapshot (which features OWB 1.2.0)!!! :) On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>wrote: > nowhere normally > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > 2013/4/30 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > > > Were there any LOGGER LEVEL changes made in tomee/conf files? Maybe, this > > is the reason why I am getting extra detail/info in tomee log/console. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Atmosphere Framework may offer a web.xml context param that I can set > to > > > 'support out of order broadcast' since OWB 1.2...is in the house. :) > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Romain, can you take a look at something for me, please? since I am > > 'now' > > >> using Tomee 1.6.0 snapshot 2013-04-29 (OWB 1.2.0), I think Atmosphere > > >> Framework is not ready for OWB 1.2.0, because I am getting the > > following in > > >> my netbeans console: > > >> > > >> Apr 30, 2013 10:08:28 AM org.atmosphere.cpr.DefaultBroadcaster <init> > > >> INFO: /administrator20130430100812 support Out Of Order Broadcast: > false > > >> > > >> I reported this in Atmosphere google group list [1]. Now, I assume > that, > > >> if I revert to a previous version of TomEE 1.6.0 snapshot, I may not > see > > >> this Atmosphere Framework INFO/message in tomee console log. > > >> > > >> Bit more background...last night (early this morning), I downloaded > the > > >> latest Atmosphere 1.0.13 snapshot JARs, deployed to production server, > > and > > >> I don't see this behavior at all. Please note, I am 'not' yet running > > TomEE > > >> 1.6.0 (OWB 1.2) on production server yet. > > >> > > >> [1] > > >> > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/atmosphere-framework/PSaKjlFg8zk > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Thanks Romain. Well, I downloaded 2013-04-29 version/JAR of tomee > 1.6.0 > > >>> snapshot, and my app works 100%. :) > > >>> > > >>> I 'think' I saw the difference in speed, but then again, this was > > >>> local/dev server instead of production server (which is much faster > > than my > > >>> dev server). > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> if you have issues maybe that's bugs, if not the code should stay > the > > >>>> same > > >>>> > > >>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > >>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > >>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > >>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > >>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > >>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 2013/4/30 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > > >>>> > > >>>> > Question... > > >>>> > > > >>>> > Based on the addition of OWB 1.2.0 to TomEE 1.6.0 snapshot and the > > >>>> > following, > > >>>> > > > >>>> > Cleaning up the Bean creation > > >>>> > > > >>>> > In the past we had 2 ways to create beans. If an Extension used > > >>>> > ProcessAnnotatedType to tweak the AnnotatedType of a class then we > > >>>> built > > >>>> > the *Bean<T>* from the modified *AnnotatedType<T>*. For cases > where > > >>>> the > > >>>> > AnnotatedType did not get modified we took a completely different > > >>>> part and > > >>>> > created the Bean from the Class reflection information. This part > > >>>> came from > > >>>> > a time where there was no AnnotatedType in the spec yet. > > >>>> > > > >>>> > In OWB-1.2.0 we now do all the Bean<T> construction based on the > > >>>> > AnnotatedType - regardless if it got provided by a CDI-Extension > or > > >>>> > remained unchanged. This made our codebase much easier to > maintain! > > >>>> Arne > > >>>> > also did a great job by introducing and cleaning up all the > > >>>> BeanBuilders > > >>>> > and making the final Bean<T> immutable. > > >>>> > > > >>>> > (How) Should I modify this code, below, in my app to effectively > use > > >>>> OWB > > >>>> > 1.2.0? > > >>>> > > > >>>> > /* > > >>>> > * > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/enterprise/inject/spi/BeanManager.html > > >>>> > * > > >>>> > > > http://struberg.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/why-is-openwebbeans-so-fast/ > > >>>> > */ > > >>>> > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > >>>> > public <T> T getBean(Class<T> type) { > > >>>> > Bean<T> bean = (Bean<T>) > > >>>> > beanManager.resolve(beanManager.getBeans(type)); > > >>>> > CreationalContext<T> creationalContext = > > >>>> > > > >>>> beanManager.createCreationalContext(bean); > > >>>> > > > >>>> > return (T) beanManager.getReference(bean, type, > > >>>> creationalContext); > > >>>> > } > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > >>>> > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > LOL, interesting that you all mentioned OWB 1.1.7, but did not > > >>>> mention > > >>>> > OWB > > >>>> > > 1.1.8. I know that TomEE has been using OWB 1.1.8 for some time > > >>>> now. I > > >>>> > > guess OWB 1.2 is somewhat-more-faster than OWB 1.1.8. :) This is > > >>>> REALLY > > >>>> > > peaking my interest! I love fast/performing app! > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > There is no bells and whistle and especially no reflection - > just > > >>>> pure > > >>>> > > plain Java bytecode which is blazingly fast! > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > Btw, we do very similar stuff for non-intercepted methods of > > >>>> > > intercepted/decorated classes. And we also improved the handling > > of > > >>>> > > intercepted methods and are now more than twice as fast as > > OWB-1.1.7 > > >>>> > (which > > >>>> > > was already very fast). > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > >>>> > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > >> Interesting, still reading...[1] > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> As result of this unified handling we only stored the native > > >>>> Contextual > > >>>> > >> Instances in the Contexts (Session, Request map, Conversation > > map, > > >>>> etc). > > >>>> > >> The negative side effect of this approach was that we had to > > >>>> introduce a > > >>>> > >> quite hacky mechanism to regain access to the > CreationalContext. > > >>>> > Needless > > >>>> > >> to say that this was not only complex but also error prone. > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> [1] http://blogs.apache.org/owb/ > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > >>>> > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >>> +1 cool! > > >>>> > >>> > > >>>> > >>> I'm about to download now/ASAP. I was about to ask you, what > do > > >>>> the > > >>>> > test > > >>>> > >>> results reveal of recently-added owb 1.2 to tomee 1.6.0 > > snapshot, > > >>>> but > > >>>> > >>> evidently, you knew where I was going. > > >>>> > >>> > > >>>> > >>> > > >>>> > >>> > > >>>> > >>> > > >>>> > >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >>>> > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > >>> > > >>>> > >>>> cdi 1.0 tcks just passed this morning > > >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > >>>> > >>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > >>>> > >>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > >>>> > >>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > >>>> > >>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > >>>> > >>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> 2013/4/30 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > > >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > Are there many more tomee refactorings required, since owb > > 1.2 > > >>>> is in > > >>>> > >>>> the > > >>>> > >>>> > house? :) > > >>>> > >>>> > > > >>>> > >>>> > I just thought about reading, News from OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 > > >>>> [1], and > > >>>> > >>>> so far > > >>>> > >>>> > it looks interesting. > > >>>> > >>>> > > > >>>> > >>>> > The Apache OpenWebBeans team has been quite busy with big > > >>>> > >>>> refactorings. Big > > >>>> > >>>> > improvements have been made to the proxying mechanism, the > > Bean > > >>>> > >>>> scanning > > >>>> > >>>> > and the AnnotatedType handling. We managed to improve the > > >>>> overall > > >>>> > >>>> > performance again and now deliver almost native Java like > > >>>> > performance > > >>>> > >>>> for > > >>>> > >>>> > our NormalScoping proxies. > > >>>> > >>>> > > > >>>> > >>>> > to read more, click URL below > > >>>> > >>>> > > > >>>> > >>>> > [1] http://blogs.apache.org/owb/ > > >>>> > >>>> > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>>> > >>>> > <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>>> > >>>> > > > >>>> > >>>> > > Hi, > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > shouldn't change anything for you (that's the goal and > > still > > >>>> in > > >>>> > >>>> progress) > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > >>>> > >>>> > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau > >* > > >>>> > >>>> > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > >>>> > >>>> > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > >>>> > >>>> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > >>>> > >>>> > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > 2013/4/29 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > Okay, owb 1.2 is in the house. Can you please clarify > > what > > >>>> is > > >>>> > >>>> changing > > >>>> > >>>> > > with > > >>>> > >>>> > > > bean manager due to OpenWebBeans (owb) version 1.2 > and/or > > >>>> > >>>> TOMEE-916[1]? > > >>>> > >>>> > > Any > > >>>> > >>>> > > > risks, pros, cons, performance enhancements, etc...? > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > I am using bean manager instead of CODI bean manager. > > that > > >>>> is > > >>>> > why > > >>>> > >>>> I'm > > >>>> > >>>> > > > asking. :) > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > thanks, > > >>>> > >>>> > > > Howard > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-916 > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>> > >>>> > > > >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>> > > >>>> > >>> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >
