Is OWB 1.2 possibly creating new instance on every user/HTTP request (full page refresh) due to some interceptor/JSF-lifecycle?
atmosphere (working as designed) will output the msg when the default broadcaster is instantiated, but it seems as though default broadcaster is instantiated on every request, now, with the following combo: 1. 2013-04-29 tomee 1.6.0 snapshot 2. 2013-04-26 atmosphere 1.0.13 snapshot On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>wrote: > Error in atmos.jar but checked it is ok > Le 30 avr. 2013 19:15, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > > you said, that it can be a scanning issue. scanning issue = OWB 1.2 > issue? > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > You lost me...:( > > > Le 30 avr. 2013 18:54, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <[email protected]> > a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > hahaha... true. > > > > > > > > I just recognized something. last night, I was running tomEE 1.6.0 > > > snapshot > > > > 2013-04-26, and that version has OWB 1.2, and I saw no issue last > night > > > > (earlier this morning) with atmosphere 1.0.13 snapshot 2013-04-26. > > > > > > > > so, i wonder what has changed with tomee 1.6.0 snapshot versions > > > 2013-04-26 > > > > and 2013-04-29. the issue exists when I use tomee 1.6.0 snapshot > > > > 2013-04-29. > > > > > > > > tomee 1.6.0 snapshot 2013-04-29 works well with atmosphere 1.0.13 > > > snapshot > > > > 2013-04-15. no unwanted behavior. > > > > > > > > this is very strange. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > You change everything at the same time, nobody can help you this > way > > > > > Le 30 avr. 2013 18:39, "Howard W. Smith, Jr." < > > [email protected]> > > > a > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > Romain, I really think that you/TomEE/OWB committers should look > at > > > > this > > > > > > since OWB 1.2 has changes in interceptor implementation. Below is > > my > > > > last > > > > > > response in that Atmosphere forum topic[1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jeanfrancois, look at all this below, please. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, April 30, 2013 10:00:36 AM UTC-4, Howard Smith wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I downloaded new versions of the following, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> tomee 1.6.0 snapshot (2013-04-29, which includes > > recently-released > > > > > > >> OpenWebBeans 1.2.0) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Okay, I reverted to joda-time 2.0, and I still see this issue. > > > > > > > OpenWebBeans 1.2.0 does something with CDI decorator and > > > interceptor > > > > > > > stuff/implementation[1]. I wonder if this is interfering with > > > > > Atmosphere > > > > > > > Framework implementation or Atmosphere Framework is not ready > for > > > OWB > > > > > > 1.2.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] http://blogs.apache.org/owb/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just recognized something. PRIOR to using TomEE 1.6.0 snapshot > > > (which > > > > > > features new OWB 1.2.0), Atmosphere (1.0.13 snapshot 2013-04-10) > > > > > > initialized with the following in my log file: > > > > > > > > > > > > Apr 28, 2013 12:20:34 AM org.atmosphere.cpr.AtmosphereFramework > > > > > interceptor > > > > > > INFO: Installed AtmosphereInterceptor Atmosphere LifeCycle. > > > > > > Apr 28, 2013 12:20:34 AM org.atmosphere.cpr.AtmosphereFramework > > > > > > addAtmosphereHandler > > > > > > INFO: Installed AtmosphereHandler > > > > > > org.primefaces.push.PrimeAtmosphereHandler mapped to > context-path: > > /* > > > > > > > > > > > > NOW, since I started using TomEE 1.6.0 snapshot (which features > new > > > OWB > > > > > > 1.2.0 for interceptors, decorators, etc...), Atmosphere is > > > initialized > > > > as > > > > > > follows: > > > > > > > > > > > > Apr 30, 2013 9:37:57 AM org.atmosphere.cpr.AtmosphereFramework > > > > > interceptor > > > > > > INFO: Installed AtmosphereInterceptor Atmosphere LifeCycle. > > > > > > Apr 30, 2013 9:37:57 AM org.atmosphere.cpr.DefaultBroadcaster > > <init> > > > > > > INFO: /* support Out Of Order Broadcast: false > > > > > > Apr 30, 2013 9:37:57 AM org.atmosphere.cpr.AtmosphereFramework > > > > > > addAtmosphereHandler > > > > > > INFO: Installed AtmosphereHandler > > > > > > org.primefaces.push.PrimeAtmosphereHandler mapped to > context-path: > > /* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what has changed between 2013-04-15 and 2013-04-26 versions of > > > > Atmosphere > > > > > > 1.0.13 snapshot with respect to atmosphere interceptor, > lifecycle, > > > > > etc...? > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/atmosphere-framework/PSaKjlFg8zk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > hmmm okay/interesting. I'll have to see if this is a logging > > issue > > > > with > > > > > > > Atmosphere Framework. Let me try some previous versions of > > > Atmosphere > > > > > > that > > > > > > > I downloaded earlier. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I definitely want to use TomEE 1.6.0 snapshot (which features > OWB > > > > > > > 1.2.0)!!! :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> nowhere normally > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > > > > > >> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > > > > > >> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > > > > > >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > > > > > >> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > > > > > >> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> 2013/4/30 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Were there any LOGGER LEVEL changes made in tomee/conf > files? > > > > Maybe, > > > > > > >> this > > > > > > >> > is the reason why I am getting extra detail/info in tomee > > > > > log/console. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > > > > > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > Atmosphere Framework may offer a web.xml context param > that > > I > > > > can > > > > > > set > > > > > > >> to > > > > > > >> > > 'support out of order broadcast' since OWB 1.2...is in the > > > > house. > > > > > :) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > > > > > >> > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Romain, can you take a look at something for me, please? > > > since > > > > I > > > > > am > > > > > > >> > 'now' > > > > > > >> > >> using Tomee 1.6.0 snapshot 2013-04-29 (OWB 1.2.0), I > think > > > > > > Atmosphere > > > > > > >> > >> Framework is not ready for OWB 1.2.0, because I am > getting > > > the > > > > > > >> > following in > > > > > > >> > >> my netbeans console: > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Apr 30, 2013 10:08:28 AM > > > org.atmosphere.cpr.DefaultBroadcaster > > > > > > <init> > > > > > > >> > >> INFO: /administrator20130430100812 support Out Of Order > > > > > Broadcast: > > > > > > >> false > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> I reported this in Atmosphere google group list [1]. > Now, I > > > > > assume > > > > > > >> that, > > > > > > >> > >> if I revert to a previous version of TomEE 1.6.0 > snapshot, > > I > > > > may > > > > > > not > > > > > > >> see > > > > > > >> > >> this Atmosphere Framework INFO/message in tomee console > > log. > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Bit more background...last night (early this morning), I > > > > > downloaded > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > >> > >> latest Atmosphere 1.0.13 snapshot JARs, deployed to > > > production > > > > > > >> server, > > > > > > >> > and > > > > > > >> > >> I don't see this behavior at all. Please note, I am 'not' > > yet > > > > > > running > > > > > > >> > TomEE > > > > > > >> > >> 1.6.0 (OWB 1.2) on production server yet. > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> [1] > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/atmosphere-framework/PSaKjlFg8zk > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > > > > > >> > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>> Thanks Romain. Well, I downloaded 2013-04-29 version/JAR > > of > > > > > tomee > > > > > > >> 1.6.0 > > > > > > >> > >>> snapshot, and my app works 100%. :) > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> I 'think' I saw the difference in speed, but then again, > > > this > > > > > was > > > > > > >> > >>> local/dev server instead of production server (which is > > much > > > > > > faster > > > > > > >> > than my > > > > > > >> > >>> dev server). > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > > > > >> > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> if you have issues maybe that's bugs, if not the code > > > should > > > > > stay > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > >> > >>>> same > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > > > > > >> > >>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau < > https://twitter.com/rmannibucau > > >* > > > > > > >> > >>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > > > > > >> > >>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > > > > > >> > >>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > > > > > >> > >>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> 2013/4/30 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected] > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > Question... > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > Based on the addition of OWB 1.2.0 to TomEE 1.6.0 > > > snapshot > > > > > and > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > >> > >>>> > following, > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > Cleaning up the Bean creation > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > In the past we had 2 ways to create beans. If an > > > Extension > > > > > used > > > > > > >> > >>>> > ProcessAnnotatedType to tweak the AnnotatedType of a > > > class > > > > > then > > > > > > >> we > > > > > > >> > >>>> built > > > > > > >> > >>>> > the *Bean<T>* from the modified *AnnotatedType<T>*. > For > > > > cases > > > > > > >> where > > > > > > >> > >>>> the > > > > > > >> > >>>> > AnnotatedType did not get modified we took a > completely > > > > > > different > > > > > > >> > >>>> part and > > > > > > >> > >>>> > created the Bean from the Class reflection > information. > > > > This > > > > > > part > > > > > > >> > >>>> came from > > > > > > >> > >>>> > a time where there was no AnnotatedType in the spec > > yet. > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > In OWB-1.2.0 we now do all the Bean<T> construction > > based > > > > on > > > > > > the > > > > > > >> > >>>> > AnnotatedType - regardless if it got provided by a > > > > > > CDI-Extension > > > > > > >> or > > > > > > >> > >>>> > remained unchanged. This made our codebase much > easier > > to > > > > > > >> maintain! > > > > > > >> > >>>> Arne > > > > > > >> > >>>> > also did a great job by introducing and cleaning up > all > > > the > > > > > > >> > >>>> BeanBuilders > > > > > > >> > >>>> > and making the final Bean<T> immutable. > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > (How) Should I modify this code, below, in my app to > > > > > > effectively > > > > > > >> use > > > > > > >> > >>>> OWB > > > > > > >> > >>>> > 1.2.0? > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > /* > > > > > > >> > >>>> > * > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/enterprise/inject/spi/BeanManager.html > > > > > > >> > >>>> > * > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > http://struberg.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/why-is-openwebbeans-so-fast/ > > > > > > >> > >>>> > */ > > > > > > >> > >>>> > @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") > > > > > > >> > >>>> > public <T> T getBean(Class<T> type) { > > > > > > >> > >>>> > Bean<T> bean = (Bean<T>) > > > > > > >> > >>>> > beanManager.resolve(beanManager.getBeans(type)); > > > > > > >> > >>>> > CreationalContext<T> creationalContext = > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> beanManager.createCreationalContext(bean); > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > return (T) beanManager.getReference(bean, > type, > > > > > > >> > >>>> creationalContext); > > > > > > >> > >>>> > } > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Howard W. Smith, > Jr. < > > > > > > >> > >>>> > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > LOL, interesting that you all mentioned OWB 1.1.7, > > but > > > > did > > > > > > not > > > > > > >> > >>>> mention > > > > > > >> > >>>> > OWB > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > 1.1.8. I know that TomEE has been using OWB 1.1.8 > for > > > > some > > > > > > time > > > > > > >> > >>>> now. I > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > guess OWB 1.2 is somewhat-more-faster than OWB > 1.1.8. > > > :) > > > > > This > > > > > > >> is > > > > > > >> > >>>> REALLY > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > peaking my interest! I love fast/performing app! > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > There is no bells and whistle and especially no > > > > reflection > > > > > - > > > > > > >> just > > > > > > >> > >>>> pure > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > plain Java bytecode which is blazingly fast! > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > Btw, we do very similar stuff for non-intercepted > > > methods > > > > > of > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > intercepted/decorated classes. And we also improved > > the > > > > > > >> handling > > > > > > >> > of > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > intercepted methods and are now more than twice as > > fast > > > > as > > > > > > >> > OWB-1.1.7 > > > > > > >> > >>>> > (which > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > was already very fast). > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Howard W. Smith, > > Jr. < > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> Interesting, still reading...[1] > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> As result of this unified handling we only stored > > the > > > > > native > > > > > > >> > >>>> Contextual > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> Instances in the Contexts (Session, Request map, > > > > > > Conversation > > > > > > >> > map, > > > > > > >> > >>>> etc). > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> The negative side effect of this approach was that > > we > > > > had > > > > > to > > > > > > >> > >>>> introduce a > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> quite hacky mechanism to regain access to the > > > > > > >> CreationalContext. > > > > > > >> > >>>> > Needless > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> to say that this was not only complex but also > error > > > > > prone. > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> [1] http://blogs.apache.org/owb/ > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Howard W. Smith, > > Jr. > > > < > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>> +1 cool! > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>> I'm about to download now/ASAP. I was about to > ask > > > you, > > > > > > what > > > > > > >> do > > > > > > >> > >>>> the > > > > > > >> > >>>> > test > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>> results reveal of recently-added owb 1.2 to tomee > > > 1.6.0 > > > > > > >> > snapshot, > > > > > > >> > >>>> but > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>> evidently, you knew where I was going. > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Romain > > Manni-Bucau < > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> cdi 1.0 tcks just passed this morning > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau < > > > > https://twitter.com/rmannibucau > > > > > >* > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> *LinkedIn: ** > > http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> 2013/4/30 Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > Are there many more tomee refactorings > required, > > > > since > > > > > > owb > > > > > > >> > 1.2 > > > > > > >> > >>>> is in > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> the > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > house? :) > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > I just thought about reading, News from > > > > > > OpenWebBeans-1.2.0 > > > > > > >> > >>>> [1], and > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> so far > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > it looks interesting. > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > The Apache OpenWebBeans team has been quite > busy > > > > with > > > > > > big > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> refactorings. Big > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > improvements have been made to the proxying > > > > mechanism, > > > > > > the > > > > > > >> > Bean > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> scanning > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > and the AnnotatedType handling. We managed to > > > > improve > > > > > > the > > > > > > >> > >>>> overall > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > performance again and now deliver almost > native > > > Java > > > > > > like > > > > > > >> > >>>> > performance > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> for > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > our NormalScoping proxies. > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > to read more, click URL below > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > [1] http://blogs.apache.org/owb/ > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Romain > > > Manni-Bucau > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > Hi, > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > shouldn't change anything for you (that's > the > > > goal > > > > > and > > > > > > >> > still > > > > > > >> > >>>> in > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> progress) > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau < > > > > > > https://twitter.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > >> >* > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* > < > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > *LinkedIn: ** > > > > http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > 2013/4/29 Howard W. Smith, Jr. < > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > Okay, owb 1.2 is in the house. Can you > > please > > > > > > clarify > > > > > > >> > what > > > > > > >> > >>>> is > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> changing > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > with > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > bean manager due to OpenWebBeans (owb) > > version > > > > 1.2 > > > > > > >> and/or > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> TOMEE-916[1]? > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > Any > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > risks, pros, cons, performance > enhancements, > > > > > etc...? > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > I am using bean manager instead of CODI > bean > > > > > > manager. > > > > > > >> > that > > > > > > >> > >>>> is > > > > > > >> > >>>> > why > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> I'm > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > asking. :) > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > thanks, > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > Howard > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > [1] > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-916 > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > >> > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > > >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
