+1 Bjorn i don't have experience with openEJB 'without' TomEE+, but I downloaded Geronimo (and even JBOSS) and tried to use it...when I was migrating from Glassfish to Tomcat/TomEE. As you said, TomEE was the easiest, and TomEE committers allowed me to be successful with the migration from Glassfish to TomEE.
i love tomee! On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Bjorn Danielsson < [email protected]> wrote: > My perception of TomEE is that it is a lot easier to configure than > any other Java EE server. I guess this is a benefit from its OpenEJB > roots. I have run OpenEJB alongside other Java application servers on > the same VM, and I have installed TomEE on things like Raspberry Pi. > Never seen anything so flexible. > > Happy new year to everyone :) > > -- > Bjorn Danielsson > Cuspy Code AB > > > Matej <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello everyone and happy new year. > > > > In the comapny where I am working we are slowly migrating our AS server > > from GF to something different. Currently we are in a evaluation process. > > > > What confuses us litlle with TomEE. Is the Geronimo status. Geronimo at > > first looks more EE compliant an production ready then TomEE. It's also > > based on Tomcat, and according to mailing lists I see the same people on > > both projects. So I am a little confused, why was TomEE created in the > > first place. > > > > Will Geronimo and TomEE coexist,... Is IBM slowly abandoning Geronimo or > > are they going back from their community version to Geronimo. > > > > I know this are political questions, but it would be nice to have some of > > the information before committing to a particular AS. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Matej >
