components needs to get a compatible license...but an apache product WILL implement jpa 2.1 for sure, if not openjpa I"m sure some guys will be happy to fork it @apache and let openjpa die but I'm pretty sure too it will not be needed and openjpa will impl it. Think it is more a time issue ATM than anything else. The rush for EE 7 already started even @ apache but slower than jboss/oracle since we are few to be paid for it (are there in fact ATM?). Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014/1/3 Matej <[email protected]>: > Thank you everyone for answers. I am/was already sold on TomEE, I like the > whole concept and the community! > > I was just inteested in the Geronimo status. Because TomEE uses allot of > Geronimo/IBM components(openjpa). Now that IBM seems to slowly stop > involvement I was a little afraid how this will affect TomEE and Apache JEE > components in the long run. Jboss/Oracle are pushing hard with JEE7, > already planning 8. And OpenJPA still discussing if to implement JPA 2.1, > which is a litlle worrying. Does every component has to come from Apache?:) > > BR, > > Matej > > > 2014/1/2 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > >> +1 Bjorn >> >> i don't have experience with openEJB 'without' TomEE+, but I downloaded >> Geronimo (and even JBOSS) and tried to use it...when I was migrating from >> Glassfish to Tomcat/TomEE. As you said, TomEE was the easiest, and TomEE >> committers allowed me to be successful with the migration from Glassfish to >> TomEE. >> >> i love tomee! >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Bjorn Danielsson < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > My perception of TomEE is that it is a lot easier to configure than >> > any other Java EE server. I guess this is a benefit from its OpenEJB >> > roots. I have run OpenEJB alongside other Java application servers on >> > the same VM, and I have installed TomEE on things like Raspberry Pi. >> > Never seen anything so flexible. >> > >> > Happy new year to everyone :) >> > >> > -- >> > Bjorn Danielsson >> > Cuspy Code AB >> > >> > >> > Matej <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > Hello everyone and happy new year. >> > > >> > > In the comapny where I am working we are slowly migrating our AS server >> > > from GF to something different. Currently we are in a evaluation >> process. >> > > >> > > What confuses us litlle with TomEE. Is the Geronimo status. Geronimo at >> > > first looks more EE compliant an production ready then TomEE. It's also >> > > based on Tomcat, and according to mailing lists I see the same people >> on >> > > both projects. So I am a little confused, why was TomEE created in the >> > > first place. >> > > >> > > Will Geronimo and TomEE coexist,... Is IBM slowly abandoning Geronimo >> or >> > > are they going back from their community version to Geronimo. >> > > >> > > I know this are political questions, but it would be nice to have some >> of >> > > the information before committing to a particular AS. >> > > >> > > >> > > Best regards, >> > > >> > > Matej >> > >>
