Plume has been certified for ee6. Now as default provider i hope to stick to openjpa as much as possible to not break hundreds of applications. Le 28 déc. 2015 13:00, "Yann Blazart" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hello, from my point of view, there's no problem. > > You can change the JPA implementation following your needs, put Hibernate > for example. > > I can garanty you that all my products running on webspehere and weblogic > was able to run in tomee. Sometimes some "proprietary" config files to > write or change, but this is part of Java EE specs. > > You can test TomEE 7.0.0-M1, it's nearly readed to be released, and it's a > fantastic EE 7 server ! > > 2015-12-28 12:30 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois < > [email protected]>: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > TomEE is quite nice but one thing which annoys me is about certification > > using EclipseLink. > > > > Let me explain my concern: > > Some application servers like Weblogic and even Liberty, quite recently, > > uses EclipseLink as the JPA layer. > > But If I look at the TomEE docs, only the Plume delivery contains > > EclipseLink as the JPA layer, but this one is not Java EE 6 certified. > > > > Just want to know, if there are future plans in order to have JAX-RS > > delivery be Java EE 6 or Java EE 7 web profile certified but using > > EclipselInk (alternative to OpenJPA) as the JPA layer ? > > I ask this question because it will most probably ease our migration > from > > some commercial app vendors to TomEE. > > > > Best Regards. > > ________________________________ > > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees > > and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or > > disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable > for > > the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended > > recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. > > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission > > free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a > > transmitted virus. > > >
