> Currently ASF is not licensee of Oracle so no project in ASF can have access 
> to TCK suite.

That’s simply FUD and not true. ASF has not licensed the EE7 tck because Oracle 
did breach the contract.
But the ASF has a EE6 TCK license.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 14.01.2016 um 20:17 schrieb Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]>:
> 
> To my knowledge, no, it is not the same. Actually without accessing TCK suite 
> ( and required to become a licensee of Oracle) , you can not use any test and 
> say that blabla server is compatible. Currently ASF is not licensee of Oracle 
> so no project in ASF can have access to TCK suite.
> 
> Best
> Gurkan
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 14 Oca 2016, at 20:45, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> With other words, most of the other vendor packages are strictly seen also 
>> not ‚certified‘ but only ‚compliant‘.
>> Which makes them not bad - it’s just that the terms often get mixed up by 
>> marketing (knowingly or not? I don’t know) and confuse users.
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 11.01.2016 um 23:04 schrieb David Blevins <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>> Correct and to be clear, there are two distinct words
>>> 
>>> - Certified = formal acknowledgement from Oracle for passing the Web 
>>> Profile or Full Profile TCK.  Oracle offers no other form of certification.
>>> - Compliant = passes the respective tests or conforms to the related spec.
>>> 
>>> In the majority of the thread the word “certified” is being used where 
>>> really “compliant” is more appropriate.
>>> 
>>> Per certification rules, there are just the two profiles (Web and Full).  
>>> To be Web Profile certified by Oracle you have to implement and pass the 
>>> Web Profile technologies and ONLY the Web Profile technologies.  If you go 
>>> one inch further and add JAX-WS, JMS or anything else, you cannot call it 
>>> “certified” even if you pass the respective tests.
>>> 
>>> If we wanted to have a Java EE 6 Web Profile certified version of TomEE 1.x 
>>> that includes EclipseLink and Mojarra, we could do that, but we’d have to 
>>> remove JAX-RS, JAX-WS, and JMS from the box as none of those are in the Web 
>>> Profile.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> David Blevins

Reply via email to