feel free to edit the website to add that where you think it fits (with the small blue pen button)
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2016-08-05 18:24 GMT+02:00 Kay Wrobel <[email protected]>: > Totally agree on the fail. So, the good word here is that PLUME works, one > simply needs to supply a beans.xml file. Anyway this can be documented very > clearly somewhere? I mean, luckily, PLUS and Web Profile, which is probably > the majority of downloads, adhere to the "optional" beans.xml and still run > in CDI 1.2 (am I right?). But since PLUME has this "deficiency", I think > it's probably worth noting somewhere. Maybe in the release notes? Or maybe > even on the downloads page? Somewhere where it's unmistakable that the > developer needs to explicitly create beans.xml or an exception will occur. > > What's your take on that? > > Kay > > > On Aug 5, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > beans.xml "is" optional (strictly speaking cause if you check what it > does > > when not there you probably want to add it back) > > > > issue is OwbAppfactory expects CDI to be there, if there is no CDI need > > then i suspect it is skipped and mojarra integration behaves differently > > than myfaces one - failing :D. > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > > > 2016-08-05 18:15 GMT+02:00 Kay Wrobel <[email protected]>: > > > >> I have added both 7.0.1 PLUS and Web Profile to my NetBeans > installation. > >> I can take the same project, switch it to PLUS or Web Profile and deploy > >> the simple web app successfully. NetBeans does NOT generate a beans.xml > >> file anymore since that has been made optional in JSF 2.2 (I believe). > >> > >> In order to test your concern, I have added a beans.xml file and now the > >> project deploys successfully! So, again, I thought the beans.xml file is > >> optional. Look at Weld 2.2 which is the CDI 1.2 reference implementation > >> and scroll down where it says that beans.xml is now optional: > >> http://weld.cdi-spec.org/news/2014/04/15/weld-220-final/ > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> Kay > >> > >>> On Aug 5, 2016, at 11:06 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> looks like CDI was completely turned off for this app, is that > possible? > >>> > >>> > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > >> rmannibucau> | > >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > >>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > >>> > >>> 2016-08-05 17:54 GMT+02:00 Kay Wrobel <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>>> Hi Romain. It's linked (see the pastebin link?). > >>>> > >>>> Kay > >>>> > >>>>> On Aug 5, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected] > >>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hello Kay, > >>>>> > >>>>> do you have the full stack? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >>>>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > >>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > >>>> rmannibucau> | > >>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > >>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > >>>>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > >>>>> > >>>>> 2016-08-05 17:39 GMT+02:00 Kay Wrobel <[email protected]>: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Dear TomEE Team, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> First of all, congrats on releasing Apache TomEE 7. I've downloaded > >>>> TomEE > >>>>>> 7.0.1 PLUME in order to test-drive it, and I am running into the > >>>> following > >>>>>> exception when I'm trying to deploy a first simple > NetBeans-generated > >>>> Web > >>>>>> Application (it's the most basic application you can create): > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> 05-Aug-2016 10:18:08.326 SEVERE [http-nio-8080-exec-10] > >>>>>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart Exception > >>>> sending > >>>>>> context initialized event to listener instance of class > >>>>>> com.sun.faces.config.ConfigureListener > >>>>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: com.sun.faces.config. > >>>> ConfigurationException: > >>>>>> Factory 'javax.faces.lifecycle.ClientWindowFactory' was not > >> configured > >>>>>> properly. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Click here for a full stack trace: http://pastebin.com/ADZvYhY0 < > >>>>>> http://pastebin.com/ADZvYhY0> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I am running this from within a VirtualBox VM running Debian 8 with > >>>>>> backports enabled for OpenJDK 8 and NetBeans 8.1 Patch 1. TomEE is > >>>>>> installed in user's home directory to avoid permissions problems. > The > >>>> web > >>>>>> application has PrimeFaces 5.0 as part of its library list if that > is > >>>>>> important. Other than that, the project is a standard JSF 2.2 / > >> JavaEE 7 > >>>>>> Web Application, as vanilla as it comes from NetBeans new web > >>>> application > >>>>>> wizard. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please advise, and thanks. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Kay Wrobel > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
