Ok, then the problem is in the integration of mojarra in tomee. Do you have
any plans to integrate it fully so that it works without this "deficiency"?

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> as mentionned owb is in the container and we fully integrate with myfaces.
> However mojarra ditribution doesn't get that deep integration and only
> works when CDI is activated.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>
> 2016-08-12 13:04 GMT+02:00 Lazar Kirchev <lazar.kirc...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got exactly the same problem when deploying an app without beans.xml.
> > However, I tried to deploy it on Tomcat + OpenWebBeans + Mojarra and it
> > worked fine. What do you think?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Lazar
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > feel free to edit the website to add that where you think it fits (with
> > the
> > > small blue pen button)
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> > > rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > >
> > > 2016-08-05 18:24 GMT+02:00 Kay Wrobel <kay.wro...@gmx.net>:
> > >
> > > > Totally agree on the fail. So, the good word here is that PLUME
> works,
> > > one
> > > > simply needs to supply a beans.xml file. Anyway this can be
> documented
> > > very
> > > > clearly somewhere? I mean, luckily, PLUS and Web Profile, which is
> > > probably
> > > > the majority of downloads, adhere to the "optional" beans.xml and
> still
> > > run
> > > > in CDI 1.2 (am I right?). But since PLUME has this "deficiency", I
> > think
> > > > it's probably worth noting somewhere. Maybe in the release notes? Or
> > > maybe
> > > > even on the downloads page? Somewhere where it's unmistakable that
> the
> > > > developer needs to explicitly create beans.xml or an exception will
> > > occur.
> > > >
> > > > What's your take on that?
> > > >
> > > > Kay
> > > >
> > > > > On Aug 5, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > beans.xml "is" optional (strictly speaking cause if you check what
> it
> > > > does
> > > > > when not there you probably want to add it back)
> > > > >
> > > > > issue is OwbAppfactory expects CDI to be there, if there is no CDI
> > need
> > > > > then i suspect it is skipped and mojarra integration behaves
> > > differently
> > > > > than myfaces one - failing :D.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog
> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> > > > rmannibucau> |
> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > 2016-08-05 18:15 GMT+02:00 Kay Wrobel <kay.wro...@gmx.net>:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I have added both 7.0.1 PLUS and Web Profile to my NetBeans
> > > > installation.
> > > > >> I can take the same project, switch it to PLUS or Web Profile and
> > > deploy
> > > > >> the simple web app successfully. NetBeans does NOT generate a
> > > beans.xml
> > > > >> file anymore since that has been made optional in JSF 2.2 (I
> > believe).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> In order to test your concern, I have added a beans.xml file and
> now
> > > the
> > > > >> project deploys successfully! So, again, I thought the beans.xml
> > file
> > > is
> > > > >> optional. Look at Weld 2.2 which is the CDI 1.2 reference
> > > implementation
> > > > >> and  scroll down where it says that beans.xml is now optional:
> > > > >> http://weld.cdi-spec.org/news/2014/04/15/weld-220-final/
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thoughts?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Kay
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> On Aug 5, 2016, at 11:06 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> looks like CDI was completely turned off for this app, is that
> > > > possible?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > >>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog
> > > > >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> > > > >> rmannibucau> |
> > > > >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > > >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > >>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> 2016-08-05 17:54 GMT+02:00 Kay Wrobel <kay.wro...@gmx.net>:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Hi Romain. It's linked (see the pastebin link?).
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Kay
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Aug 5, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Hello Kay,
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> do you have the full stack?
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > >>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > >>>>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog
> > > > >>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/
> > > > >>>> rmannibucau> |
> > > > >>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> Tomitriber
> > > > >>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > > >>>>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> 2016-08-05 17:39 GMT+02:00 Kay Wrobel <kay.wro...@gmx.net>:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Dear TomEE Team,
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> First of all, congrats on releasing Apache TomEE 7. I've
> > > downloaded
> > > > >>>> TomEE
> > > > >>>>>> 7.0.1 PLUME in order to test-drive it, and I am running into
> the
> > > > >>>> following
> > > > >>>>>> exception when I'm trying to deploy a first simple
> > > > NetBeans-generated
> > > > >>>> Web
> > > > >>>>>> Application (it's the most basic application you can create):
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> 05-Aug-2016 10:18:08.326 SEVERE [http-nio-8080-exec-10]
> > > > >>>>>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart
> > Exception
> > > > >>>> sending
> > > > >>>>>> context initialized event to listener instance of class
> > > > >>>>>> com.sun.faces.config.ConfigureListener
> > > > >>>>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: com.sun.faces.config.
> > > > >>>> ConfigurationException:
> > > > >>>>>> Factory 'javax.faces.lifecycle.ClientWindowFactory' was not
> > > > >> configured
> > > > >>>>>> properly.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Click here for a full stack trace:
> http://pastebin.com/ADZvYhY0
> > <
> > > > >>>>>> http://pastebin.com/ADZvYhY0>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> I am running this from within a VirtualBox VM running Debian 8
> > > with
> > > > >>>>>> backports enabled for OpenJDK 8 and NetBeans 8.1 Patch 1.
> TomEE
> > is
> > > > >>>>>> installed in user's home directory to avoid permissions
> > problems.
> > > > The
> > > > >>>> web
> > > > >>>>>> application has PrimeFaces 5.0 as part of its library list if
> > that
> > > > is
> > > > >>>>>> important. Other than that, the project is a standard JSF 2.2
> /
> > > > >> JavaEE 7
> > > > >>>>>> Web Application, as vanilla as it comes from NetBeans new web
> > > > >>>> application
> > > > >>>>>> wizard.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Please advise, and thanks.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Kay Wrobel
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to