Hello, Of course it will be linked to the validation complexity (for example validation with a reg exp will be slower, I guess, than a not null validation) but I want to compare the time for a rest call with bean validation and without any bean validation and measure the ratio. This is why I have mentioned 2%, 10% or ..., overhead with bean validation vs without any bean validation.
So any figure for bean validation average overhead ? Best Regards. -----Original Message----- From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: jeudi 8 décembre 2016 18:40 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Performance issue with Bean validation ? you mean removed? on the reported cases it was seconds so very visible. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2016-12-08 18:36 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois < [email protected]>: > Hello, > > Any idea about the overhead introduced : 2%, 10%, 20% ? > > Best Regards. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: mercredi 7 décembre 2016 09:02 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Performance issue with Bean validation ? > > yes > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog < > https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog < > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> > | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > | < > https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2016-12-07 9:01 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois <Francois.Courtault@gemalto. > com > >: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I think I have seen quite recently some exchanges about performance > > issue due to the Bean validation usage. > > I just want to know if it has been fixed or not in TomEE 7.0.2 ? > > > > Best Regards. > > ________________________________ > > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the > > addressees and may contain confidential information. Any > > unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be > > liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are > > not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and > > notify the > sender. > > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this > > transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for > > damages caused by a transmitted virus. > > > ________________________________ > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the > addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized > use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable > for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the > intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this > transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for > damages caused by a transmitted virus. > ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus.
