this case was not impacted by the fix but you can set to false openejb.cxf.rs.bval.active
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2016-12-08 19:24 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois < [email protected]>: > Hello, > > Of course it will be linked to the validation complexity (for example > validation with a reg exp will be slower, I guess, than a not null > validation) but I want to compare the time for a rest call with bean > validation and without any bean validation and measure the ratio. This is > why I have mentioned 2%, 10% or ..., overhead with bean validation vs > without any bean validation. > > So any figure for bean validation average overhead ? > > Best Regards. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: jeudi 8 décembre 2016 18:40 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Performance issue with Bean validation ? > > you mean removed? on the reported cases it was seconds so very visible. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog < > https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog < > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> > | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory < > https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2016-12-08 18:36 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois < > [email protected]>: > > > Hello, > > > > Any idea about the overhead introduced : 2%, 10%, 20% ? > > > > Best Regards. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: mercredi 7 décembre 2016 09:02 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Performance issue with Bean validation ? > > > > yes > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog < > > https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog < > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> > > | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > > | < > > https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > > > 2016-12-07 9:01 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois <Francois.Courtault@gemalto. > > com > > >: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > I think I have seen quite recently some exchanges about performance > > > issue due to the Bean validation usage. > > > I just want to know if it has been fixed or not in TomEE 7.0.2 ? > > > > > > Best Regards. > > > ________________________________ > > > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the > > > addressees and may contain confidential information. Any > > > unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > > > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be > > > liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are > > > not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and > > > notify the > > sender. > > > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this > > > transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for > > > damages caused by a transmitted virus. > > > > > ________________________________ > > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the > > addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized > > use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable > > for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the > > intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the > sender. > > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this > > transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for > > damages caused by a transmitted virus. > > > ________________________________ > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees > and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or > disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for > the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission > free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a > transmitted virus. >
