Hi, The use of plain CDI is intentional in this case. I don't need an EJB. Interestingly enough I did a test by changing the singleton to a javax.ejb.Singleton and using "@EJB" in the servlet. With the EJB packaged with "skinny war" the injection failed with an NPR when trying to use the EJB:
2017/10/10 09:56:59.273 WARNING [main][1][org.apache.openejb.config.JndiEncInfoBuilder.buildEjbRefs] |Unresolved ejb reference "java:comp/env/com.test.beanmanagerbug.MyServlet/mySingletonInjected" in bean "test-1.0.0.Comp". Will attempt resolution again at runtime. 2017/10/10 09:56:59.278 WARNING [main][1][org.apache.openejb.config.JndiEncInfoBuilder.buildEjbRefs] |Unresolved ejb reference "java:comp/env/com.test.beanmanagerbug.MyServlet/mySingletonInjected" in bean "/opt/tomee/apps/testear-1.0.0/test-1.0.0". Will attempt resolution again at runtime. If I changed to not use skinny wars then the EJB worked fine. Seems like skinny wars is negatively impacting openejb and openwebbeans Paul On 10 October 2017 at 09:30, Helge Waastad <he...@waastad.org> wrote: > PS, > are U sure you wanna use javax.inject.Singleton? > > Maybe javax.ejb.Singleton? > > /hw > > ti., 10.10.2017 kl. 08.34 +0200, skrev Paul Carter-Brown: > > Hi, > > > > Loaded on github and created ticket: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2134 > > > > On 10 October 2017 at 07:56, Romain Manni-Bucau > > m> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > Did you check the instance - identity hashcode for instance? I > > > wonder if it > > > is not 2 instances triggered on the same event. > > > > > > Otherwise Andy is fully right in terms of enabling us to help you. > > > > > > Le 10 oct. 2017 01:25, "Andy Gumbrecht" <agumbre...@tomitribe.com> > > > a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > > > In the interest of safety first, and benefit second, please > > > > create a > > > > ticket here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE > > > > > > > > Rather than attaching a ZIP here, please consider creating a > > > > GitHub > > > > project and sharing it in the ticket. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Andy. > > > > > > > > On 09/10/17 15:00, Paul Carter-Brown wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Please see attached a test project in which a simple singleton > > > > > is being > > > > > initialised twice (post construct is called twice). Deploy the > > > > > ear to > > > TomEE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (i'm using 7.0.3) and look at the logs. > > > > > > > > > > I picked up this issue in a large project with an ear > > > > > containing many > > > > > wars packaged as "skinny". The injected bean is in one of the > > > > > shared > > > > > libraries. > > > > > > > > > > If the pom in the ear project is changed to > > > <skinnyWars>false</skinnyWars> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and lines 44-48 are removed then the issue goes away and the > > > > > init is > > > only > > > > > > > > > > > > > > called once. > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications > > > athttp:// > > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.smilecoms.com/home/email-disclaimer/ > > > > > > > > > > /email-disclaimer/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Paul Carter-Brown* > > > > *Group Chief Information Officer* > > > > *Smile Communications Pty (Ltd) * > > Smile +234 (0) 702 000 1234 > > Mobile +27 (0) 83 4427 179 > > Skype PaulC-B > > paul.carter-br...@smilecoms.com > > www.smilecoms.com > > > -- *Paul Carter-Brown* *Group Chief Information Officer* *Smile Communications Pty (Ltd) * Smile +234 (0) 702 000 1234 Mobile +27 (0) 83 4427 179 Skype PaulC-B paul.carter-br...@smilecoms.com www.smilecoms.com -- This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications at http://www.smilecoms.com/home/email-disclaimer/ <http://www.smilecoms.com/disclaimer>
