And removing the static?

Le 10 oct. 2017 11:45, "Paul Carter-Brown" <
paul.carter-br...@opposablethumbs.io> a écrit :

> Hi Andy/Romain,
>
> I'll load on github today and create a ticket.
>
> I have verified that it is a single instance by having a static
> initializer: private static final String uuid =
> UUID.randomUUID().toString();
>
> The uuid remains the same on both calls to the postconstruct method
>
> Paul
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Did you check the instance - identity hashcode for instance? I wonder if
> it
> > is not 2 instances triggered on the same event.
> >
> > Otherwise Andy is fully right in terms of enabling us to help you.
> >
> > Le 10 oct. 2017 01:25, "Andy Gumbrecht" <agumbre...@tomitribe.com> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > In the interest of safety first, and benefit second, please create a
> > > ticket here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE
> > >
> > > Rather than attaching a ZIP here, please consider creating a GitHub
> > > project and sharing it in the ticket.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Andy.
> > >
> > > On 09/10/17 15:00, Paul Carter-Brown wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Please see attached a test project in which a simple singleton is
> being
> > >> initialised twice (post construct is called twice). Deploy the ear to
> > TomEE
> > >> (i'm using 7.0.3) and look at the logs.
> > >>
> > >> I picked up this issue in a large project with an ear containing many
> > >> wars packaged as "skinny". The injected bean is in one of the shared
> > >> libraries.
> > >>
> > >> If the pom in the ear project is changed to
> > <skinnyWars>false</skinnyWars>
> > >> and lines 44-48 are removed then the issue goes away and the init is
> > only
> > >> called once.
> > >>
> > >> Any ideas?
> > >>
> > >> Paul
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications
> > athttp://
> > >> www.smilecoms.com/home/email-disclaimer/ <
> http://www.smilecoms.com/home
> > >> /email-disclaimer/>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to