That is really dependent on things like how fast your disk drives,
network, and CPU are.
Ats has been tested to deliver 75k+ on a single box.
-Jason
On Mar 30, 2010, at 12:12 AM, "Harmer, Sean" <[email protected]>
wrote:
You bring up a great point. What are the limits of Blacklist? Does
it create a bottle neck? The blacklist example identifies the file
blacklist.txt. Could ATS handle this txt file if it had over
40,000 entries?
2010/3/29 Jason Giedymin <[email protected]>
Sounds like you should utilize the plug-in sdk and I see you've
already found the blacklist plug.
Not sure what your looking up but make sure that it won't serve as
an additional bottle neck.
I think your on the right track.
-Jason
On Mar 29, 2010, at 5:37 PM, "Harmer, Sean" <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello again,
Can anyone speak to this? I need a way to:
Intercept the HTTP header
Use the HTTP header to do a look-up against a database
Then modify the HTTP header (if needed) and resume ATS standard
process…
Can I use Blacklist to do this? Is there a better (i.e. faster
and more consistent) way to do this that you know of?
Thank you.
Sean
--
Sean Harmer
[email protected]
703.957.9272
