Re: ATS is not abiding the cache-control's max-age in response header.

[Leif Hedstrom]

On 05/09/2011 01:49 PM, Chilappagari, Sairam wrote:

"Let me ask Mnot, but I'd say they are wrong :). From the RFC2616 (sec 
4.2)…"

Thanks for checking Leif. I really appreciate it. For now, I may have 
to stick with Last-modified for cache expiration policy I suppose.


Also, what version of CXF are you using? Taking a quick glance at the 
v2.4 code, it shouldn't produce headers like the one you showed.

-- Leif