I'm using 2.2.6. I could try using 2.3.x or 2.4 2.4 is still under development right?
From: Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 15:10:27 -0700 To: Sairam Chilappagari <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: ATS is not abiding the cache-control's max-age in response header. On 05/09/2011 01:49 PM, Chilappagari, Sairam wrote: "Let me ask Mnot, but I'd say they are wrong :). From the RFC2616 (sec 4.2)…" Thanks for checking Leif. I really appreciate it. For now, I may have to stick with Last-modified for cache expiration policy I suppose. Also, what version of CXF are you using? Taking a quick glance at the v2.4 code, it shouldn't produce headers like the one you showed. -- Leif
