Hi,
Thanks for head up Emiliano. I believe, that is to be expected; performance difference between baremetal and virtualization (V). Maybe i can find out which proxy server is more V 'friendly' or what V feature can offer to make up for the performance drop penalty. By the way, do you have any idea on my first question previously ? Thanks again Emiliano. On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Emiliano Bonansea < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Don't bet too much on seeing high performance caching in virtualized > infrastructure. The disk I/O performance required for caching and storing > is too high, so using virtualization will decrease the performance due to > random I/O operations from different VMs. > > good luck! > Emiliano > > El 17/09/2013 12:01 p.m., Mohd Akhbar escribió: > > Hi, > > Mind sharing how do you guys use this plugin ? I want to try to cache > youtube videos as it is use as the teaching tool in the classroom. With > 150mbit internet line and thousands (more than 10k) of students, i really > hope ATS + cacheurl would saves our bandwidth. My question, can youtube be > cached ? Because my regex that i ask couple month back did not succeed. > Have anybody got any success caching the youtube video ? If yes, can it be > shared ? > > Secondly, i'm also doing my masters degree & my project would be proxy > efficiency namely ATS & squid operating on baremetal server and also on > virtualization with Xen, KVM & VMware ESXi in mind. I hope i could seek > help and advise from all the gurus and sifoos here. > > Thanks. > > >
