I think SSD technology will improve the V performance, but I've seen
that SSD is a little bit inmature, of course this is a personal apreciation.
Sorry can't help with your youtube caching problem, are you sure is
related to regexp?
regards
Emiliano
Interlink SRL
El 17/09/2013 01:02 p.m., Mohd Akhbar escribió:
Hi,
Thanks for head up Emiliano. I believe, that is to be expected;
performance difference between baremetal and virtualization (V). Maybe
i can find out which proxy server is more V 'friendly' or what V
feature can offer to make up for the performance drop penalty. By the
way, do you have any idea on my first question previously ? Thanks
again Emiliano.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Emiliano Bonansea
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
Don't bet too much on seeing high performance caching in
virtualized infrastructure. The disk I/O performance required for
caching and storing is too high, so using virtualization will
decrease the performance due to random I/O operations from
different VMs.
good luck!
Emiliano
El 17/09/2013 12:01 p.m., Mohd Akhbar escribió:
Hi,
Mind sharing how do you guys use this plugin ? I want to try to
cache youtube videos as it is use as the teaching tool in the
classroom. With 150mbit internet line and thousands (more than
10k) of students, i really hope ATS + cacheurl would saves our
bandwidth. My question, can youtube be cached ? Because my regex
that i ask couple month back did not succeed. Have anybody got
any success caching the youtube video ? If yes, can it be shared ?
Secondly, i'm also doing my masters degree & my project would be
proxy efficiency namely ATS & squid operating on baremetal server
and also on virtualization with Xen, KVM & VMware ESXi in mind. I
hope i could seek help and advise from all the gurus and sifoos here.
Thanks.
