On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm, when was LuaJit 2.1 released? I can't see it on the download page. In > general, we try to stay up to date with the releases. > > As for bundling, that was an intentional choice since many (most?) of the > distorts and versions we support don't have (had?) LuaJit available. We can > revisit that if / when it's a generally supported package on all platforms. > > The other reason for inclusion was that we planned on have Lua be a first > class citizen for configs etc > > Cheers, > > -- Leif > > > > On Aug 11, 2015, at 10:59 AM, Mark Moseley <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:35 PM, James Peach <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > On Aug 10, 2015, at 4:53 PM, Mark Moseley <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > I've got trafficserver on the same box as another app that's using >> Luajit 2.1. I've been goofing with trying to get Trafficserver working with >> luajit 2.1 too, but reached the point where I figured I should ask before I >> burn any more time: >> > >> > Can Trafficserver be used with luajit 2.1? I was compiling 5.3.1 and >> it's got luajit 2.0.3 bundled right with the source. There's no configure >> option to point at a different luajit tree. I was about to start messing >> with the various LUA_* environment vars, when I realized it was time to ask >> the list. >> > >> > Any options? >> >> AFAIK the ability to choose a different Lua implementation was removed >> when LuaJIT was bundled into the main source tree. >> >> > Ok, good to know. I tried building ATS with the luajit 2.1 sources copied > into the lib/luajit directory, but that blows up during compilation. > Probably better to just get the other app working with luajit 2.0. > > Out of curiosity, why is luajit bundled anyway? Installing the 'dev' > luajit packages for ubuntu/debian/centos seems pretty easy, though perhaps > for people not on those distro, might be a lot harder. > > Luajit 2.1 hasn't been released yet, though they claim it's pretty much production ready. Though I wasn't suggesting that ATS be bundled by default with 2.1. I was just curious if it was possible to use an alternate one if you wanted to. Or to have it use the system luajit, instead of using the bundled one.
