Ah. Yeah I'd be +1 on a configure option to use the system or locally provided library. Patches welcome :)
-- Leif > On Aug 18, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Mark Moseley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Leif Hedstrom <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hmm, when was LuaJit 2.1 released? I can't see it on the download page. In >> general, we try to stay up to date with the releases. >> >> As for bundling, that was an intentional choice since many (most?) of the >> distorts and versions we support don't have (had?) LuaJit available. We can >> revisit that if / when it's a generally supported package on all platforms. >> >> The other reason for inclusion was that we planned on have Lua be a first >> class citizen for configs etc >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- Leif >> >> >> >>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 10:59 AM, Mark Moseley <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:35 PM, James Peach <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > On Aug 10, 2015, at 4:53 PM, Mark Moseley <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > I've got trafficserver on the same box as another app that's using >>>> > Luajit 2.1. I've been goofing with trying to get Trafficserver working >>>> > with luajit 2.1 too, but reached the point where I figured I should ask >>>> > before I burn any more time: >>>> > >>>> > Can Trafficserver be used with luajit 2.1? I was compiling 5.3.1 and >>>> > it's got luajit 2.0.3 bundled right with the source. There's no >>>> > configure option to point at a different luajit tree. I was about to >>>> > start messing with the various LUA_* environment vars, when I realized >>>> > it was time to ask the list. >>>> > >>>> > Any options? >>>> >>>> AFAIK the ability to choose a different Lua implementation was removed >>>> when LuaJIT was bundled into the main source tree. >>> >>> Ok, good to know. I tried building ATS with the luajit 2.1 sources copied >>> into the lib/luajit directory, but that blows up during compilation. >>> Probably better to just get the other app working with luajit 2.0. >>> >>> Out of curiosity, why is luajit bundled anyway? Installing the 'dev' luajit >>> packages for ubuntu/debian/centos seems pretty easy, though perhaps for >>> people not on those distro, might be a lot harder. > > Luajit 2.1 hasn't been released yet, though they claim it's pretty much > production ready. > > Though I wasn't suggesting that ATS be bundled by default with 2.1. I was > just curious if it was possible to use an alternate one if you wanted to. Or > to have it use the system luajit, instead of using the bundled one.
