> you know damn well thats not what i meant! jackass. the current "global id" > idea is simply not enough to fix much of anything.
:) I was merely seeing it as a starting point for thinking about a solution. I think it would be possible, though like I said, it would very easily become over-engineered. So - considering you don't think a global id is any use to start with - that leaves us with having a shared jar then, right? Or do you have other ideas? Eelco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
