On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 19:10 +0200, Jan Kriesten wrote: > > > <dependency> > > <groupId>junit</groupId> > > <artifactId>junit</artifactId> > > <version>3.8.1</version> > > <scope>provided</scope> > > </dependency> > > Actually, I don't have junit in my classpath on the server - and Wicket seems > not so bound to it?! >
As a general rule JUnit is only used for unit testing. I suspect that's also the case with wicket. It is not required as a run-time dependency. Indeed, I'm not sure why its scope is set to "provided" rather than "test". With the scope set as test, maven would only download the dependency as needed to run unit tests on the project. -- Philip A. Chapman Desktop and Web Application Development: Java, .NET, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MSSQL Linux, Windows 2000, Windows XP
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
