It is not a bug. It is a kind of RFE or a request for usage of best practices when coding client-side code. I was curious if you share the same thoughts.
igor.vaynberg wrote: > > file a bug and preferrably create a patch. > > -igor > > > On 8/27/07, Alex Objelean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> I've noticed that wicket-extension components (for instance palette.js) >> pollute the js namespace. Wouldn't it be better to create a namespace for >> them? Something like this would be pretty: Wicket.Extensions.Palette. >> >> This proposal is valid for any other components which contribute with js >> files. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Thank you! >> Alex. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/JS-space-pollution-in-wicket-extensions-tf4333870.html#a12343022 >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JS-space-pollution-in-wicket-extensions-tf4333870.html#a12356503 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
