igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> yeah, but you are forgetting that you will also need the compound variant,
> blah blah. before you know it you have replicated a bunch of the
> hierarchy.
> like i said, lets have a vote, propose as many variants of this as you
> want
> and we can see where it goes/what people prefer.
>
Right. What if we have a SelfCompoundPropertyModel? It can serve as the
middle man for access to the component's private fields. So in principle it
is doable.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Alternative-to-Wicket-data-binding-tf4322899.html#a12379505
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
