in principle a lot of things are doable :) -igor
On 8/28/07, Kent Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > igor.vaynberg wrote: > > > > yeah, but you are forgetting that you will also need the compound > variant, > > blah blah. before you know it you have replicated a bunch of the > > hierarchy. > > like i said, lets have a vote, propose as many variants of this as you > > want > > and we can see where it goes/what people prefer. > > > > Right. What if we have a SelfCompoundPropertyModel? It can serve as the > middle man for access to the component's private fields. So in principle > it > is doable. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Alternative-to-Wicket-data-binding-tf4322899.html#a12379505 > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
