Would that not be too soon? The Button could not have been added to a form
yet?
My particular use case is that I have a chunk of code that returns a tree of
components that may not yet be attached to a page/form...
Matthijs Wensveen-2 wrote:
>
> Or maybe:
>
> public AjaxButton(String id)
> {
> this(id, getForm());
> }
>
>
> This could work the same for AjaxFallbackButton.
>
> Matthijs
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
>> It is needed i guess if we say that the method
>> protected abstract void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget ajaxrequesttarget,
>> Form
>> form1);
>>
>> needs a form parameter that can't be null
>>
>> Also i see something strange in the AjaxButton because if you dont give
>> the
>> form then the form parameter
>> can be null:
>>
>> public AjaxButton(String id)
>> {
>> this(id, null);
>> }
>>
>> public Form getForm()
>> {
>> if(form != null)
>> return form;
>> else
>> return super.getForm();
>> }
>>
>> public AjaxButton(String id, final Form form)
>> {
>> super(id);
>> this.form = form;
>> add(new AjaxFormSubmitBehavior("onclick", form) {
>>
>> protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target)
>> {
>> AjaxButton.this.onSubmit(target, form);
>> }
>>
>> protected void onError(AjaxRequestTarget target)
>> {
>> AjaxButton.this.onError(target, form);
>> }
>>
>> i think this is wrong, but maybe it was on purpose?
>> i think it should be:
>>
>> public AjaxButton(String id)
>> {
>> this(id, null);
>> }
>>
>> public Form getForm()
>> {
>> if(form != null)
>> return form;
>> else
>> return super.getForm();
>> }
>>
>> public AjaxButton(String id, final Form form)
>> {
>> super(id);
>> this.form = form;
>> add(new AjaxFormSubmitBehavior("onclick", form) {
>>
>> protected void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target)
>> {
>> AjaxButton.this.onSubmit(target, getForm());
>> }
>>
>> protected void onError(AjaxRequestTarget target)
>> {
>> AjaxButton.this.onError(target, getForm());
>> }
>>
>> So that we return the given form or try to find one.
>>
>> johan
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/3/07, Sam Hough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Since neither AjaxButton or Button require Form in the constructor why
>>> does
>>> AjaxFallbackButton? Seems a shame to make it required if not really
>>> needed...
>>>
>>> I'm not quite clear from the source or comments what the difference is
>>> in
>>> AjaxButton between the behaviour from the two different constructors...
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackButton-really-require-Form-in-constructor--tf4370843.html#a12457890
>>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Matthijs Wensveen
> Func. Internet Integration
> W http://www.func.nl
> T +31 20 4230000
> F +31 20 4223500
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackButton-really-require-Form-in-constructor--tf4370843.html#a12462188
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
