Again, try using NonCachingImage instead of Image. I does exacly what
the suggested fix does. I just overlooked it.
-Matej
On 9/10/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it did not work for me using ajax. Until I added one of the
> solutions described.
>
> Should I provide a quickstart?
>
> regards Nino
>
> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > as far as i know Image works just fine with ajax. if you want an image that
> > is not cached use NonCachingImage.
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On 9/9/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This has been rejected as invalid for fixing... But should'nt at least
> >> something have been added to the component. Currently Image are not
> >> valid for ajax calls, and you wont see the problem until you catch it in
> >> your browser.. Either we write something in the javadocs or??? Could be
> >> nice to tell if the component did not work with ajax, somehow.
> >>
> >> regards Nino
> >>
> >> Matej Knopp wrote:
> >>
> >>> Well, i guess with component path encoded in url, the milliseconds could
> >>>
> >> do ;)
> >>
> >>> -Matej
> >>>
> >>> On 9/7/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Yes, but all those images will have a different url, or are they the
> >>>> same? The milliseconds parameter is only used to distinguish between
> >>>> requests, not within one.
> >>>>
> >>>> Martijn
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/7/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Really? What's so odd about it? Say you have a page with 100 images.
> >>>>> How long do you think such page renders? It shouldn't take long than
> >>>>> say 5 ms on a decent machine.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Matej
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> 2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same client/session?
> >>>>>> that looks very very very odd to me.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> johan
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> >>>>>>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Actually we discussed that.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
> >>>>>>> don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same
> >>>>>>>
> >> millisecond.. As
> >>
> >>>>>>> for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated in
> >>>>>>>
> >> the
> >>
> >>>>>>> same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really
> >>>>>>>>
> >> concerned
> >>
> >>>>>>>> use nanotime.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> >>>>>>>>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Resolutions are these two :
> >>>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> >>>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> >>>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
> >>>>>>>>> Math.random());
> >>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
> >>>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> >>>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> >>>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
> >>>>>>>>> getPage().getAutoIndex());
> >>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a
> >>>>>>>>>
> >> feature
> >>
> >>>>>>>>> request for it to be implemented.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -Nino
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> this is whats generated:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener
> >>
> >>>>>>> ::
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> request to
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> thought
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>> we already did that?).
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> >>>>>>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> that
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
> >>>>>>>>>>>> comes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> >>>> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
> >>>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
