...to be "politically" correct, "Application Framework", but I'm referring to the portion of the framework that addresses the UI.
-----Original Message----- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 12:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Wicket vs. JSF/Seam (The Dead Debate) I didnt know Seam was a UI framework... -Igor On 9/14/07, William Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Our company is in the process of evaluating the feasibility in > transitioning our UI framework to Wicket. In doing so, I stumbled upon this > article > http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2007/05/14/a-wicket-user-tries-jsf/ that > does a nice job of composing a simple side-by-side comparison of JSF and > Wicket. > > We are currently using JSF/MyFaces/Tomahawk/Trinidad and have found it to > be quite a disappointment. I have personally been developing JSF > applications for several years and have encountered numerous issues with the > framework (not to mention the specification, components, etc.). I never > understood how JSF can be referred to as a true MVC framework when it > maintains logic within the view in the form of EL (thus the Wicket > evaluation). > > With that said, I hear the argument from JSF/Seam developers (as seen in > the article mentioned above) that comparing Seam with Wicket is a > better/fair comparison. I have no experience with Seam and would like to > know if there is anyone using Wicket in this forum that has switched from > Seam to Wicket that could shed some light on the issue? > > Thanks in advance! > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
