but this discussion is not just about getter/setters (i don't care about those) but also for add and remove.. then we are getting into some other stuff
johan On 9/26/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/26/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I disagree. We need to keep an eye out for those that begin to use the > > framework. We have seen enough people that randomly start to override > > methods just to work around some perceived wall that typically isn't > > there if they actually thought about their problem in the first place. > > Well yeah, in general that is true. For setters... I've grown tired of > the many discussions here I guess. > > Eelco > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
