Is this coding style documented anywhere? I have a vague memory that spring pushes towards composition not extension but that is obviously not the wicket way.
Did the people behind javax.swing, java.util make a mistake being light with final or is their task different? The Lucene people seem to make classes final presumably because extension is not meant to be done at all. Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > On 9/26/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> but this discussion is not just about getter/setters (i don't care about >> those) >> but also for add and remove.. then we are getting into some other stuff > > Yes. Getters/ setters are less tricky. Though I'm still not breaking > in sweat when I imagine removing final on add and remove. > > Eelco > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/auto-dirty-and-widget-factory-tf4421187.html#a12917546 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
