Thanks Al,
That is what I was after. The rendering stuff is waaay over my head.
Gwyn : nabble cut most of my post for some reason, I've been using two
components (link and label) but it seems very verbose when 90% of my links
are to text... Many thanks.
Cheers
Sam
Al Maw wrote:
>
> Sam Hough wrote:
>> Lots of the time I just want a link with text as the body of the ... ...
>>
>> The Link class takes an IModel so presumably uses that for something but
>> I
>> can't see it in the source or get it to appear...
>>
>> Sorry I'm being thick and I did search honest!
>
> You'd typically use the model so you have something to get at in the
> onClick().
>
> Of course, if you don't care about how much state is in your session,
> you can just make whatever it is final so you can use it in there anyway.
>
> If you want to use the model for the text of the link instead, then you
> could write a class like this:
>
>
> public abstract class TextLink extends Link {
> public TextLink(String id, IModel model) {
> super(id, model);
> }
>
> protected void onComponentTagBody(final MarkupStream markupStream,
> final ComponentTag openTag)
> {
> replaceComponentTagBody(
> markupStream, openTag, getModelObjectAsString()
> );
> }
>
> }
>
>
> If you want enabled/disabled to work properly, you'll need to copy the
> relevant bits out of AbstractLink#onComponentTagBody(...)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Al
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Link-text-tf4751114.html#a13591081
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
