On Nov 7, 2007 1:39 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You wouldn't write such a component for general purposes obviously.
ok, that right there i really really dont like. define "general purpose"? so now we have features in wicket that are guaranteed to work and others that arent? this is going to turn the framework into an abysmal pile of crap. why should i only use some "safe" subset when writing a component im planning on reusing across projects? -igor Of > course it can be optional (it might have to be a whole separate tag > rather than building on wicket:extend); it's up to the users after > that. > > > Eelco > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
