On Nov 7, 2007 2:02 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 7, 2007 1:39 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You wouldn't write such a component for general purposes obviously. > > ok, that right there i really really dont like. define "general > purpose"? so now we have features in wicket that are guaranteed to > work and others that arent? this is going to turn the framework into > an abysmal pile of crap. why should i only use some "safe" subset when > writing a component im planning on reusing across projects?
Nah, you're over-reacting. It would just mean that people would use it for their internal projects, which would be fine with me really. Eelco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
