Yes that is the solution that also gets my vote for 1.4 if we can implement it nicely and if it is backwards compartible and straightforward to use.
johan On Nov 8, 2007 10:37 AM, Jan Kriesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi everyone, > > actually, i wonder what is wrong with al's suggestion to add id's to > <wicket:child> and <wicket:extend>? > > regards, --- jan. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
