Jan Kriesten wrote:
hi everyone,

actually, i wonder what is wrong with al's suggestion to add id's to
<wicket:child> and <wicket:extend>?

regards, --- jan.

That is what I'd suggest as well, since it involves the least amount of change. As an added bonus, if no id's are added and 2 <wicket:child> sections are used, it could throw an exception (which it currently does not do, it just silently ignores the second <wicket:child>).

Regards,
Sebastiaan

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to