> Evan Chooly wrote: > > > >> Do you know if theres any plans on making a maven2 archetype for > qwicket? > > > > That's a definite feature i plan on adding as soon as I can. As a > > noted maven hater, though, it'll take some time and libations to help > > me swallow my pride. :) > > > > Good luck! Archetypes are really a pain, because of the template text > strings in the source that keep them from compiling in place, so they're > hard to code, test, and maintain. I just abandoned mine.
> People can almost as easily rename classes and packages after the fact, I've rationalized. > Alleluia brother - I hear what you're saying! Whoever decided declaring stuff in type safe, compile time checked Java was hard? I've certainly never found writing or updating Java classes hard - probably because that's what I do every day! Give me Java config over XML config any day. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
