Re: @AuthorizeInstanciation and several roles

[Sébastien Piller]

Yes, I tried it too, but it doesn't work. The right syntax seems to be @AutorizeInstanciation( { "poweruser", "admin", "sysadmin" } ) Thanks nasrin mansour a écrit : hi i don't have enough experience in this topic like you but i think if you look at wicket-role-auth-example it's usuful and i think you must wite this : @AuthorizeInstanciation("poweruser,admin,sysadmin") in this way: @AuthorizeInstanciation("poweruser ", "admin", "sysadmin") On Dec 31, 2007 3:35 AM, Pills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I'm using the wicket-auth-roles package to allow or restrict access to some pages. I need to autorize the instanciation of some pages to several roles. Is it possible to write something like: @AuthorizeInstanciation("poweruser,admin,sysadmin") class Mypage extends WebPage {...} and something like this in my authenticated session: public Roles getRoles() { return new Roles(new String[] {"poweruser","admin","sysadmin"}); } If it's possible, what is the right syntax? PS: I've read a bit about wasp/swarm, but it looks too much complicated for my needs (I just need to prevent some components to be instantiated for some kinds of users). Hiding/showing links and such fonctionnality is not needed Thank you ;) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%40AuthorizeInstanciation-and-several-roles-tp14552711p14552711.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]