yes i said this before , has my syntax any different with your's?
On Dec 31, 2007 2:07 PM, Sébastien Piller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I tried it too, but it doesn't work.
>
> The right syntax seems to be @AutorizeInstanciation( *{* "poweruser",
> "admin", "sysadmin" *}* )
>
> Thanks
>
> nasrin mansour a écrit :
>
> hi
> i don't have enough experience in this topic like you but i think if you
> look at wicket-role-auth-example it's usuful and
> i think you must wite this :
> @AuthorizeInstanciation("poweruser,admin,sysadmin")
> in this way:
> @AuthorizeInstanciation("poweruser ", "admin", "sysadmin")
>
> On Dec 31, 2007 3:35 AM, Pills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using the wicket-auth-roles package to allow or restrict access to
> some
> pages. I need to autorize the instanciation of some pages to several
> roles.
> Is it possible to write something like:
>
> @AuthorizeInstanciation("poweruser,admin,sysadmin")
> class Mypage extends WebPage {...}
>
> and something like this in my authenticated session:
>
> public Roles getRoles() {
> return new Roles(new String[] {"poweruser","admin","sysadmin"});
> }
>
> If it's possible, what is the right syntax?
>
> PS: I've read a bit about wasp/swarm, but it looks too much complicated
> for
> my needs (I just need to prevent some components to be instantiated for
> some
> kinds of users). Hiding/showing links and such fonctionnality is not
> needed
>
> Thank you ;)
> --
> View this message in
> context:http://www.nabble.com/%40AuthorizeInstanciation-and-several-roles-tp14552711p14552711.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
